- Fixes strange warnings in mingw builds (one item in #923).
- Enables more and more fine-grained compiler warnings.
- Fixes minor build issue on macOS #896 on macOS.
- Makes compiler warnings into errors on CI (
-Werror
, mentioned in #929 (comment)).
Various improvements related to CFLAGS #944
pull real-or-random wants to merge 5 commits into bitcoin-core:master from real-or-random:202105-ci-werror changing 5 files +95 −63-
real-or-random commented at 7:37 pm on May 13, 2021: contributor
-
real-or-random cross-referenced this on May 13, 2021 from issue ci: Set -Werror for all CI builds by real-or-random
-
real-or-random commented at 7:40 pm on May 13, 2021: contributor
CI seems to be confused here because this is the same source branch as on #938 . Trying to close and reopen the PR to fix it.
edit: ok, didn’t work. I forced push the last commit with a new date to make it work.
-
real-or-random closed this on May 13, 2021
-
real-or-random reopened this on May 13, 2021
-
real-or-random force-pushed on May 13, 2021
-
real-or-random force-pushed on May 25, 2021
-
real-or-random commented at 12:48 pm on May 25, 2021: contributorrebased
-
roconnor-blockstream commented at 9:30 pm on May 28, 2021: contributorLGTM. I did test building in under Nixos, but that was the extent of my testing.
-
in build-aux/m4/bitcoin_secp.m4:86 in 64ec678daa outdated
81@@ -82,3 +82,19 @@ if test x"$has_valgrind" != x"yes"; then 82 AC_CHECK_HEADER([valgrind/memcheck.h], [has_valgrind=yes; AC_DEFINE(HAVE_VALGRIND,1,[Define this symbol if valgrind is installed])]) 83 fi 84 ]) 85+ 86+dnl SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([flags], VAR)
hebasto commented at 2:10 pm on June 2, 2021:From my understanding, the square brackets[...]
in a comment, that describes a new macro, means that parameter is optional. They do not mean quoting. Right?
real-or-random commented at 3:20 pm on June 10, 2021:fixedin configure.ac:73 in 64ec678daa outdated
65@@ -70,35 +66,40 @@ case $host_os in 66 ;; 67 esac 68 69-CFLAGS="-W $CFLAGS"
hebasto commented at 2:11 pm on June 2, 2021:Maybe document the removing of-W
option?
real-or-random commented at 10:17 am on June 7, 2021:Apparently I’ve documented it here already https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/944/files#diff-49473dca262eeab3b4a43002adb08b4db31020d190caaad1594b47f1d5daa810R95
hebasto commented at 11:57 am on June 7, 2021:Ah, right.hebasto commented at 2:21 pm on June 2, 2021: memberApproach ACK 64ec678daaf215e007d44433cdc9b969b6e09098, tested on:
- Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64)
- macOS 11.4 (20F71)
Warnings introduced in #700 (reported in #896) are gone.
The last two commits seems the one to me, maybe squash them? But maybe another approach could be considered?
Why a CI is not a “user” from the Automake’s point of view? If so, why to introduce the
WERROR_CFLAGS
variable, while we have a dedicatedCFLAGS
one?real-or-random commented at 3:06 pm on June 2, 2021: contributorWhy a CI is not a “user” from the Automake’s point of view? If so, why to introduce the
WERROR_CFLAGS
variable, while we have a dedicatedCFLAGS
one?It may seem overly complicated but I think it’s better for testing/CI because it does not interfere with autoconf’s default for
CFLAGS
(which is-g -O2
or just-g
depending on the compiler). What we typically want to test in CI is building with unsetCFLAGS
. We could always set-Werror -g -O2
instead of-Werror
but that seems complicated too.By the way, I think I overlooked this line: https://github.com/real-or-random/secp256k1/blob/202105-ci-werror/configure.ac#L397 Will address the other comments.
hebasto commented at 3:21 pm on June 2, 2021: memberWhy a CI is not a “user” from the Automake’s point of view? If so, why to introduce the
WERROR_CFLAGS
variable, while we have a dedicatedCFLAGS
one?It may seem overly complicated but I think it’s better for testing/CI because it does not interfere with autoconf’s default for
CFLAGS
(which is-g -O2
or just-g
depending on the compiler). What we typically want to test in CI is building with unsetCFLAGS
. We could always set-Werror -g -O2
instead of-Werror
but that seems complicated too.Ah, indeed. This repo does not have the
--enable-werror
configure option as Bitcoin Core has :)real-or-random commented at 3:39 pm on June 2, 2021: contributorOh interesting, maybe I should just have looked at Core then… ;)
For context: #938 (comment)
Anyway, this thing here works and I don’t want to touch it further unless necessary.
real-or-random force-pushed on Jun 10, 2021real-or-random commented at 3:20 pm on June 10, 2021: contributorAddressed the comments. I also rebased on master (sorry, that wasn’t even intentional…)
The last two commits seems the one to me, maybe squash them?
Done.
hebasto commented at 8:46 pm on June 10, 2021: memberACK a5c6ff2917edf97e888c441eb545ac70083b5376in .cirrus.yml:6 in a5c6ff2917 outdated
0@@ -1,21 +1,28 @@ 1 env: 2- WIDEMUL: auto 3+ ### compiler options 4+ HOST: 5+ # Specific warnings can be disabled with -Wno-error=foo. 6+ # -pedantic-errors is not equivalent to -Werror=pedantic and thus not implied by -Werror according to the GCC manual. 7+ WERROR_CFLAGS: -Werror -pedantic-errors
jonasnick commented at 10:48 am on June 30, 2021:nit: trailing whitespacein configure.ac:90 in a5c6ff2917 outdated
114+ # Try to append -Werror=unknown-warning-option to CFLAGS temporarily. Otherwise clang will 115+ # not error out if it gets unknown warning flags and the checks here will always succeed 116+ # no matter if clang knows the flag or not. 117+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_DEFAULT_CFLAGS_saved_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" 118+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Werror=unknown-warning-option], CFLAGS) 119+
jonasnick commented at 10:48 am on June 30, 2021:nit: trailing whitespacein configure.ac:99 in a5c6ff2917 outdated
123+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wno-unused-function], $1) # GCC >= 3.0, -Wunused-function is implied by -Wall. 124+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wextra], $1) # GCC >= 3.4, this is the newer name of -W, which we don't use because older GCCs will warn about unused functions. 125+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wcast-align=strict], $1) # GCC >= 8.0 126+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wconditional-uninitialized], $1) # Clang >= 3.0 only 127+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-fvisibility=hidden], $1) # GCC >= 4.0 128+
jonasnick commented at 10:49 am on June 30, 2021:nit: trailing whitespacein configure.ac:97 in a5c6ff2917 outdated
120+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-std=c89 -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wnested-externs -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef], $1) # GCC >= 3.0, -Wlong-long is implied by -pedantic. 121+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wno-overlength-strings], $1) # GCC >= 4.2, -Woverlength-strings is implied by -pedantic. 122+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wall], $1) # GCC >= 2.95 and probably many other compilers 123+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wno-unused-function], $1) # GCC >= 3.0, -Wunused-function is implied by -Wall. 124+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wextra], $1) # GCC >= 3.4, this is the newer name of -W, which we don't use because older GCCs will warn about unused functions. 125+ SECP_TRY_APPEND_CFLAGS([-Wcast-align=strict], $1) # GCC >= 8.0
jonasnick commented at 3:03 pm on June 30, 2021:clang doesn’t have-Wcast-align=strict
but only-Wcast-align
. Since this PR replaces the latter with the former, when using clang there are no alignment warnings anymore.build: Use own variable SECP_CFLAGS instead of touching user CFLAGS
Fixes one of the items in #923, namely the warnings of the form '_putenv' redeclared without dllimport attribute: previous dllimport ignored [-Wattributes] This also cleans up the way we add CFLAGS, in particular flags enabling warnings. Now we perform some more fine-grained checking for flag support, which is not strictly necessary but the changes also help to document autoconf.ac.
build: Enable -Wcast-align=strict warning 595e8a35d8build: List *CPPFLAGS before *CFLAGS like on the compiler command line 7939cd571cbuild: Ensure that configure's compile checks default to -O2
Fixes #896.
real-or-random force-pushed on Jul 1, 2021ci: Make compiler warning into errors on CI
This also tidies the list of environment variables in .cirrus.yml.
real-or-random force-pushed on Jul 1, 2021real-or-random commented at 6:38 pm on July 1, 2021: contributorfixedjonasnick commented at 7:43 pm on July 1, 2021: contributorACK 0302138f7508414e9e5212bc45b4ca4c0e5f081cjonasnick merged this on Jul 1, 2021jonasnick closed this on Jul 1, 2021
sipa referenced this in commit c020cbaa5c on Jul 14, 2021apoelstra cross-referenced this on Jul 27, 2021 from issue Upstream PRs 879, 959, 955, 944, 951, 960, 844, 963, 965 by apoelstraapoelstra referenced this in commit 196c993d1f on Jul 28, 2021janus referenced this in commit 62075fc9aa on Nov 5, 2021patricklodder referenced this in commit 21badcf9d2 on Jul 25, 2022patricklodder referenced this in commit 03002a9013 on Jul 28, 2022hebasto cross-referenced this on Mar 14, 2023 from issue build: Ensure no optimization when building for coverage analysis by hebastoreal-or-random referenced this in commit 0cf2fb91ef on Mar 21, 2023str4d referenced this in commit 7648f6bf55 on Apr 21, 2023vmta referenced this in commit e1120c94a1 on Jun 4, 2023vmta referenced this in commit 8f03457eed on Jul 1, 2023
github-metadata-mirror
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin-core/secp256k1. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-22 04:15 UTC
This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me