No description provided.
-
gmaxwell commented at 9:20 PM on March 9, 2019: contributor
- gmaxwell added this to the milestone initial release on May 23, 2019
-
gmaxwell commented at 12:33 AM on May 24, 2019: contributor
Travis should also test make install.
-
benma commented at 7:59 AM on July 19, 2019: contributor
Related: Travis does not seem to run
./tests. Is there a reason for that? -
real-or-random commented at 8:43 AM on July 19, 2019: contributor
It does, see https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/jobs/560256756#L708 for example. It just runs the entire testsuite using
make check-TESTS. Maybe we should just update the README. -
benma commented at 12:02 PM on July 19, 2019: contributor
Of course!
Updated README here: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/652
-
real-or-random commented at 3:56 PM on August 17, 2019: contributor
Travis should also test different window size settings.
-
real-or-random commented at 5:14 PM on October 8, 2019: contributor
Travis has now (alpha) support for ARM: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2019-10-07-multi-cpu-architecture-support
-
elichai commented at 10:32 AM on November 8, 2019: contributor
FWIW it's arm64, and we have asm only for arm, not arm64.
-
laanwj commented at 10:39 AM on November 8, 2019: member
It can build and run ARM executables on ARM64 (FWIW this is what we do in bitcoin in the ARM64 travis run, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17233)
-
elichai commented at 10:44 AM on November 8, 2019: contributor
Didn't know arm64 can execute arm binaries. i'll give this a try
-
laanwj commented at 11:06 AM on November 8, 2019: member
I think it's a feature that many SoCs have, including the one Travis happens to use, not a general requirement for arm64
- MarcoFalke cross-referenced this on Dec 5, 2019 from issue travis: Add some arm builds by MarcoFalke
- real-or-random cross-referenced this on Jan 6, 2020 from issue General CI discussion by real-or-random
- jonasnick removed this from the milestone initial release on Apr 28, 2020
-
gmaxwell commented at 5:02 AM on July 28, 2020: contributor
Even just having arm64 would be a big improvement. Sure, that wouldn't test that the arm ASM builds and works-- which is the critical thing motivating this issue, but there isn't anything blocking that as far as I know.
Similarly, there appears to be no BE host in this project's travis configuration. s390x is be, I believe. (lol)
-
elichai commented at 8:12 AM on July 28, 2020: contributor
- real-or-random cross-referenced this on May 3, 2021 from issue Add ARM32/ARM64 CI by sipa
-
real-or-random commented at 11:43 AM on December 20, 2021: contributor
This has been solved by #930.
- real-or-random closed this on Dec 20, 2021
