Default to defining endian-conversion DECLs in compat w/o config #12998

pull TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from TheBlueMatt:2018-04-default-decls changing 1 files +45 −0
  1. TheBlueMatt commented at 3:47 pm on April 16, 2018: member

    While this isn’t a supported build configuration, some build systems need to build without going through our autotools steps, so defaulting to something sane may make it easier to build.

    Specifically, this fixes the inability to build rust-bitcoinconsensus on some non-x86 platforms. It needs to build without our autotools/configure steps to ensure correct compile args are passed from the rust build system to gcc. Converting the args from the rust build system to gcc would be a lot of unmaintainable work.

  2. Default to defining endian-conversion DECLs in compat w/o config
    While this isn't a supported build configuration, some build
    systems need to build without going through our autotools steps,
    so defaulting to something sane may make it easier to build.
    
    Specifically, this fixes the inability to build
    rust-bitcoinconsensus on some non-x86 platforms. It needs to build
    without our autotools/configure steps to ensure correct compile
    args are passed from the rust build system to gcc. Converting the
    args from the rust build system to gcc would be a lot of
    unmaintainable work.
    150b2f0265
  3. laanwj commented at 5:09 pm on April 16, 2018: member

    I’m not sure making this assumption makes sense - the environment might or might not have those functions, without configure (or similar) that’s impossible to know.

    You could also define the -DHAVE_DECL_BE16TOH etc on the compiler command line, or ship with a pre-existing config.h?

  4. laanwj added the label Build system on Apr 16, 2018
  5. TheBlueMatt commented at 6:36 pm on April 16, 2018: member
    In my use-case (rust-bitcoinconsensus) we don’t know anything more about the environment than non-configure Bitcoin. Re-implementing just enough of Bitcoin Core’s configure to define the appropriate symbols seems like the wrong way to go (and would be entirely unmaintainable), actually running autogen/configure would also be a pain as we’d have to figure out what environment we’re targeting and appropriately convert gcc flags to configure flags (as well as probably reimplement parts of the “compile a C dependency” rust module that is well-maintained by others). Not sure of another easy solution aside from this, but if we don’t take it we should almost certainly add a #ifndef HAVE_CONFIG_H #error “You need to run configure first” in a bunch of places.
  6. theuni commented at 2:57 pm on April 18, 2018: member

    Agree with @laanwj.

    Also agree with @TheBlueMatt about this being annoying, though. I’ve run into this exact issue as well, usually when I try to copy/paste sha256.cpp into a quick project.

    As these are non-standard, I don’t think there’s a default that makes more sense than any other. For example, I believe that these aren’t present on macOS. And I don’t think we can assume that they’re always defines when they do exist.

    Imo what makes the most sense is (using htobe16 as an example):

    • rename all external calls to htobe16_int. I don’t think there should be (m)any of these outside of crypto/.
    • If HAVE_CONFIG_H, htobe16_int is defined as htobe16, essentially as it’s done now
    • If no HAVE_CONFIG_H and HAVE_DECL_HTOBE16, same as above, so that it can be overridden by other projects that know about their environment
    • If no HAVE_CONFIG_H and no HAVE_DECL_HTOBE16, htobe16_int is an explicit manual conversion function
  7. TheBlueMatt commented at 6:38 pm on April 18, 2018: member
    I mean I’m open to doing the big refactor and proxying everything through inline “int” functions, but I figured that would be a bigger deal than just skipping compile of the conversion functions in the case where they’re already defined (ie its super obvious we dont need them). Its not supposed to be a foolproof solution, just a simple fix that happens to be sufficient in some cases, and creates ever-so-slightly more robust defaults.
  8. theuni commented at 5:26 pm on April 19, 2018: member

    I was a bit too hasty in my review of this.

    I see where you’re coming from now. This won’t fix all non-autotools builds, but it should be strictly an improvement in cases where these defines exist.

    I’d still prefer _int functions since we only use these in crypto/ and serialize.h, but barring that, I see now that it’s hard to argue against this.

    utACK 150b2f0265f11590940d9c89560b5c067f4d2120

  9. laanwj commented at 8:19 am on April 21, 2018: member

    utACK - with the #ifdef htole16 condition it makes some sense, there’s no implicit assumption now. I suppose there’s no way to shortcut this like

    0#define HAVE_DECL_HTOBE16 defined(htobe16)
    
  10. laanwj merged this on Apr 22, 2018
  11. laanwj closed this on Apr 22, 2018

  12. laanwj referenced this in commit 3e60b9cfa7 on Apr 22, 2018
  13. fanquake added the label Needs backport on Apr 24, 2018
  14. fanquake commented at 3:17 pm on April 24, 2018: member
    I can include this in #12967.
  15. MarcoFalke commented at 3:36 pm on April 24, 2018: member
    @TheBlueMatt Is this for backport?
  16. MarcoFalke added this to the milestone 0.16.1 on Apr 25, 2018
  17. fanquake referenced this in commit 5c9473833b on Apr 26, 2018
  18. fanquake referenced this in commit 7847b92605 on Apr 26, 2018
  19. TheBlueMatt commented at 11:45 pm on April 27, 2018: member
  20. MarcoFalke commented at 11:47 pm on April 27, 2018: member
    @TheBlueMatt It is included in #12967 (you are very welcome to review it)
  21. laanwj referenced this in commit feba12fe85 on May 16, 2018
  22. fanquake removed the label Needs backport on May 16, 2018
  23. HashUnlimited referenced this in commit 18bf65ed59 on Jun 29, 2018
  24. jasonbcox referenced this in commit 1bf9852e2c on Sep 13, 2019
  25. jonspock referenced this in commit 920f0b57bb on Dec 22, 2019
  26. proteanx referenced this in commit bfa052e874 on Dec 23, 2019
  27. PastaPastaPasta referenced this in commit f6bbb2c16a on Apr 3, 2020
  28. zkbot referenced this in commit 0376e3d1f0 on Dec 18, 2020
  29. zkbot referenced this in commit 502f8c0ad3 on Dec 21, 2020
  30. zkbot referenced this in commit 6c64bb83c2 on Jan 4, 2021
  31. zkbot referenced this in commit 1614f1ebd0 on Jan 4, 2021
  32. ckti referenced this in commit d8e2ffb6f1 on Mar 28, 2021
  33. DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-21 18:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me