Drop ParseHashUV in favor of calling ParseHashStr #13422

1. 
   Empact commented at 5:54 pm on June 8, 2018: member

   The one existing call already validates get_str will pass via checkObject: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13422/files#diff-8fe4d6985ee4acf8bfc1ed8db1e83cb5L586

   Split from #13420

2. Drop ParseHashUV in favor of calling ParseHashStr

   The one existing call already validates get_str will
   pass via checkObject.

   abd2678ac1
3. 
   MarcoFalke commented at 6:18 pm on June 8, 2018: member

   utACK abd2678ac1af10f55b8b29507407c9e286e06f09
4. 
   Empact commented at 0:54 am on June 9, 2018: member

   7 hours without a tag and I’m worried for the health and safety of @fanquake. :P
5. fanquake added the label Refactoring on Jun 9, 2018
6. 
   Empact commented at 1:23 am on June 9, 2018: member

   Glad you’re still with us! ;)
7. 
   promag commented at 1:45 pm on June 10, 2018: member

   utACK abd2678.
8. 
   DrahtBot commented at 8:27 pm on June 14, 2018: member

   • #13399 (rpc: Add submitblockheader by MarcoFalke)

   If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

9. 
   sipa commented at 1:02 am on June 15, 2018: member

   utACK abd2678ac1af10f55b8b29507407c9e286e06f09
10. MarcoFalke merged this on Jun 15, 2018
11. MarcoFalke closed this on Jun 15, 2018

    ---

12. MarcoFalke referenced this in commit 2b770080a4 on Jun 15, 2018
13. Empact deleted the branch on Jul 2, 2018
14. PastaPastaPasta referenced this in commit 1c002dd1b6 on Jul 7, 2020
15. MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021

Contributors
Empact MarcoFalke promag DrahtBot sipa

Labels
Refactoring