Don't access static members from class instances.
Be explicit about the fact that the members we're accessing are static.
Don't access static members from class instances.
Be explicit about the fact that the members we're accessing are static.
After posting this PR I see that the Qt documentation has an example with app.exec();. Am I mistaken here? :-)
<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->Note to reviewers: This pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
I'm not sure this is an improvement...
@Empact That could that could very well be the case, but please help me understand why you think so :-)
I believe this is generally a good idea.
Concept ACK.
Are these the only cases?
@promag Yes AFAIK :-)
I'm not sure this is an improvement...
Me neither TBH. Let's not make changes just to make changes!
Please illustrate how this avoids bugs, otherwise I don't see the point. Currently it's possible to change the class and the calls will go to exactly the right class.
Closing due to lack of consensus ACK :-)