So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
refactor: Extract ParseDescriptorRange #15744
pull Empact wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from Empact:parse-descriptor-range changing 7 files +48 −23-
Empact commented at 7:42 AM on April 4, 2019: member
- fanquake added the label RPC/REST/ZMQ on Apr 4, 2019
-
DrahtBot commented at 9:14 AM on April 4, 2019: member
<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
<!--174a7506f384e20aa4161008e828411d-->
Conflicts
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
- #15996 (Deprecate totalfee argument in
bumpfeeby instagibbs) - #15427 (Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt by sipa)
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
- #15996 (Deprecate totalfee argument in
-
practicalswift commented at 9:44 AM on April 4, 2019: contributor
Concept ACK
Consistency is good :-)
-
promag commented at 11:43 AM on April 4, 2019: member
Concept ACK, and code looks good.
ProcessImportDescriptornow returns new errors, would be nice to have them tested. - Empact force-pushed on Apr 5, 2019
-
Empact commented at 8:48 AM on April 5, 2019: member
Added tests for
importmultiandscantxoutsetconditions.deriveaddresseswas covered here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c83442e17412b96f00bc29d30763b28184c95f1e/test/functional/rpc_deriveaddresses.py#L37-L43 -
meshcollider commented at 12:54 AM on April 14, 2019: contributor
Looks good, do you also want to add a check that end >= start?
-
510c6532ba
Extract ParseDescriptorRange
So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
- Empact force-pushed on Apr 14, 2019
-
Empact commented at 2:07 AM on April 14, 2019: member
@meshcollider Thankfully that's covered in
ParseRangehttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/66ce95a4340019ed3be8a36a8aeec86e4f0ace85/src/rpc/util.cpp#L665Added that check to the new test coverage.
-
meshcollider commented at 3:58 AM on April 14, 2019: contributor
Oh apologies, yes. Thanks :) utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15744/commits/510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
-
MarcoFalke commented at 8:58 PM on April 15, 2019: member
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
-
sipa commented at 12:50 AM on May 10, 2019: member
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
- MarcoFalke renamed this:
Extract ParseDescriptorRange
refactor: Extract ParseDescriptorRange
on May 10, 2019 - MarcoFalke added the label Refactoring on May 10, 2019
- MarcoFalke merged this on May 10, 2019
- MarcoFalke closed this on May 10, 2019
- MarcoFalke referenced this in commit 14959753a4 on May 10, 2019
- sidhujag referenced this in commit dc4bef3297 on May 10, 2019
- Empact deleted the branch on Jun 22, 2019
- deadalnix referenced this in commit 6a6cec44cf on Jun 17, 2020
- Munkybooty referenced this in commit 5881279b11 on Oct 16, 2021
- dzutto referenced this in commit 862fe896be on Dec 2, 2021
- dzutto referenced this in commit 60f98530d7 on Dec 2, 2021
- PastaPastaPasta referenced this in commit a490615a8b on Dec 11, 2021
- MarcoFalke locked this on Dec 16, 2021