This statistic is only reported when a new block appends onto the strongest chain.
Tested by comparing bitcoind new-block results with pynode, which performs a similar calculation.
Report 'neverseen' TXs: the number of TXs in block, but not memory pool #1652
pull jgarzik wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from jgarzik:neverseen changing 2 files +15 −8-
jgarzik commented at 6:04 PM on August 2, 2012: contributor
-
561ae122b7
Report 'neverseen' TXs: the number of TXs in block, but not memory pool
This statistic is only reported when a new block appends onto the strongest chain.
-
gmaxwell commented at 3:04 AM on August 3, 2012: contributor
Is this useful? IIRC a number of pools mine their own payouts. I expect it to mostly measure that.
-
TheBlueMatt commented at 4:44 PM on August 3, 2012: member
Would be useful to measure the potential impact of forwarding blocks as header + vector<tx hash> instead of header + vector<tx>
-
BitcoinPullTester commented at 8:01 AM on August 8, 2012: none
The following is an automatic comment from the Bitcoin Pull Tester. If you believe it is in error, please contact jenkins@bluematt.me
This pull passed automatic sanity-tests! This means it merges cleanly onto current master, builds and unit-tests pass You can find the test log and build output at http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/561ae122b7bc9d0b3b7a565767371a24a6514768
-
jgarzik commented at 8:02 PM on August 17, 2012: contributor
no ACKs gathered, closing
- jgarzik closed this on Aug 17, 2012
- jgarzik deleted the branch on Aug 24, 2014
- suprnurd referenced this in commit d07ac4fbd3 on Dec 5, 2017
- DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021
Contributors