promag
commented at 4:40 PM on March 30, 2020:
member
Based on #18338, only last commit matters. Quoting the test description:
// Test UnregisterSharedValidationInterface ensuring that if interface is
// unregistered during the middle of a callback, interface is destroyed as soon
// as callback returns.
All credits to ryanofsky.
promag
commented at 4:42 PM on March 30, 2020:
member
Initially this was in #18338, decided to push a new PR because some travis job hanged.
DrahtBot added the label GUI on Mar 30, 2020
DrahtBot added the label Tests on Mar 30, 2020
DrahtBot added the label Validation on Mar 30, 2020
DrahtBot added the label Wallet on Mar 30, 2020
DrahtBot
commented at 6:34 PM on March 30, 2020:
member
<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
<!--174a7506f384e20aa4161008e828411d-->
Conflicts
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
#18780 (validation: add const for minimum witness commitment size by fanquake)
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
ryanofsky referenced this in commit ba8312c7dc on Apr 4, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit ad067a98ea on Apr 4, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit 01639a21d1 on Apr 4, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit 3d463addfe on Apr 4, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit b5fea244e5 on Apr 5, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit c3a471604b on Apr 6, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit 96176004a3 on Apr 6, 2020
ryanofsky referenced this in commit d6815a2313 on Apr 6, 2020
laanwj referenced this in commit fdeb445a34 on Apr 6, 2020
ryanofsky
commented at 3:34 PM on April 6, 2020:
member
Do not clear validationinterface entries being executed
The previous code for MainSignalsInstance::Clear would decrement the reference
count of every interface, including ones that were already Unregister()ed but
still being executed.
promag
commented at 11:33 AM on April 7, 2020:
member
appveyor failed with OSError: [WinError 10048] Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted, restarted.
promag
commented at 12:13 PM on April 7, 2020:
member
Please set milestone 0.20
sidhujag referenced this in commit 9e2b04c4ed on Apr 8, 2020
glozow referenced this in commit 4542d48e6d on Apr 10, 2020
HashUnlimited referenced this in commit b67fc6bde0 on Apr 17, 2020
MarcoFalke added the label Needs rebase on Apr 27, 2020
MarcoFalke added the label Waiting for author on Apr 27, 2020
DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Apr 27, 2020
MarcoFalke removed the label Validation on Apr 29, 2020
MarcoFalke removed the label Waiting for author on Apr 29, 2020
MarcoFalke removed the label Wallet on Apr 29, 2020
MarcoFalke added the label Waiting for author on Apr 29, 2020
DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Apr 30, 2020
DrahtBot
commented at 2:03 PM on April 30, 2020:
member
<!--cf906140f33d8803c4a75a2196329ecb-->
🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase.
deadalnix referenced this in commit 27fc048869 on Jun 20, 2020
metalicjames referenced this in commit 09af10dec5 on Aug 5, 2020
janus referenced this in commit 400926d149 on Nov 5, 2020
backpacker69 referenced this in commit 23b252ddaf on Mar 28, 2021
fanquake
commented at 6:26 AM on April 8, 2021:
member
@promag are you still interested in working on / making this change?
MarcoFalke removed the label Waiting for author on Apr 8, 2021
DrahtBot
commented at 11:22 AM on December 15, 2021:
member
<!--13523179cfe9479db18ec6c5d236f789-->There hasn't been much activity lately and the patch still needs rebase. What is the status here?
Is it still relevant? ➡️ Please solve the conflicts to make it ready for review and to ensure the CI passes.
Is it no longer relevant? ➡️ Please close.
Did the author lose interest or time to work on this? ➡️ Please close it and mark it 'Up for grabs' with the label, so that it can be picked up in the future.
DrahtBot
commented at 1:07 PM on March 21, 2022:
member
<!--13523179cfe9479db18ec6c5d236f789-->There hasn't been much activity lately and the patch still needs rebase. What is the status here?
Is it still relevant? ➡️ Please solve the conflicts to make it ready for review and to ensure the CI passes.
Is it no longer relevant? ➡️ Please close.
Did the author lose interest or time to work on this? ➡️ Please close it and mark it 'Up for grabs' with the label, so that it can be picked up in the future.
MarcoFalke added the label Up for grabs on Mar 21, 2022
vijaydasmp referenced this in commit ad85246dda on Apr 5, 2022
fanquake closed this on Apr 26, 2022
vijaydasmp referenced this in commit bff629c6fb on May 19, 2022
vijaydasmp referenced this in commit c6add94995 on May 26, 2022
vijaydasmp referenced this in commit 5cdbd3090e on Jun 14, 2022
vijaydasmp referenced this in commit 5a3418e1fc on Jun 20, 2022
vijaydasmp referenced this in commit 88fe235bc7 on Jun 22, 2022
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository
bitcoin/bitcoin.
This site is not affiliated with GitHub.
Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-04-22 00:14 UTC
This site is hosted by @0xB10C More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me