APPEND_FLAG_IF_AVAILABLE()
and use that.
build: avoid repetitions when enabling warnings in configure.ac #18857
pull vasild wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from vasild:avoid_repetitions_in_configure.ac changing 1 files +35 −30-
vasild commented at 2:19 pm on May 3, 2020: memberIntroduce a macro
-
MarcoFalke added the label Refactoring on May 3, 2020
-
MarcoFalke commented at 2:26 pm on May 3, 2020: memberConcept ACK b26f8a0bb9bc6bb1066291e6752b7e33bea89cf9
-
brakmic commented at 2:57 pm on May 3, 2020: contributorConcept ACK b26f8a0bb9bc6bb1066291e6752b7e33bea89cf9
-
practicalswift commented at 7:29 pm on May 3, 2020: contributor
Concept ACK
Very nice initiative: this repetition has annoyed me :)
-
DrahtBot commented at 11:06 pm on May 3, 2020: member
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
Conflicts
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
- #19015 (build: Enable some commonly enabled compiler diagnostics by practicalswift)
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
-
in configure.ac:370 in b26f8a0bb9 outdated
332@@ -333,31 +333,36 @@ if test x$use_sanitizers != x; then 333 ]],[[]])]) 334 fi 335 336+dnl APPEND_FLAG_IF_AVAILABLE([APPEND_TO_THIS_VARIABLE], [-WallExtra]) 337+AC_DEFUN([APPEND_FLAG_IF_AVAILABLE], [
promag commented at 11:23 pm on May 3, 2020:Could also defineSET_FLAG_IF_AVAILABLE
and use throughout.
vasild commented at 6:10 am on May 4, 2020:That would be a little bit less straight forward. While such code would definitely benefit from it:
0AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG([-msse4.2],[[SSE42_CXXFLAGS="-msse4.2"]],,[[$CXXFLAG_WERROR]])
and become:
0SET_FLAG_IF_AVAILABLE([SSE42_CXXFLAGS], [-msse4.2])
there are other usages where the code calls
AC_MSG_ERROR()
if the flag is not available or does not compile with an additional$CXXFLAG_WERROR
.I will consider this as a separate PR.
promag commented at 0:15 am on May 5, 2020:Yeah didn’t check if all follow the same pattern. Separate PR is fine.promag commented at 11:25 pm on May 3, 2020: memberConcept ACK.DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 5, 2020fanquake added the label Build system on May 5, 2020fanquake commented at 7:35 am on May 5, 2020: memberConcept ~0. Saving same verbosity is nice, but the downsides are now having a macro that obscures what’s happening, and is applied inconsistently throughout configure; less than half of our
AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG
calls are replaced with it.This approach would also not work with the change currently proposed in #18882 (we’d end up with duplicate
-Wformat
flags). So let’s decide how we want to fix the issue in that PR, before merging something like this.vasild force-pushed on May 5, 2020DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 5, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 6, 2020vasild force-pushed on May 6, 2020DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 6, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 11, 2020vasild force-pushed on May 11, 2020vasild commented at 9:22 am on May 11, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 11, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 13, 2020vasild force-pushed on May 13, 2020vasild commented at 12:32 pm on May 13, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 13, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 13, 2020vasild force-pushed on May 21, 2020vasild commented at 8:15 am on May 21, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 21, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 28, 2020vasild force-pushed on May 28, 2020vasild commented at 8:00 pm on May 28, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 28, 2020vasild force-pushed on Jun 4, 2020vasild commented at 10:49 am on June 4, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jun 4, 2020vasild force-pushed on Jun 4, 2020vasild commented at 7:26 pm on June 4, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jun 4, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jun 8, 2020vasild force-pushed on Jun 8, 2020vasild commented at 7:32 pm on June 8, 2020: memberRebased.DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jun 8, 2020DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jul 15, 2020build: avoid repetitions when enabling warnings
Introduce a macro APPEND_FLAG_IF_AVAILABLE() and use that.
vasild force-pushed on Jul 16, 2020DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jul 16, 2020fanquake commented at 10:24 am on August 10, 2020: member@fanquake, what’s your take on this, now that #18882 has been merged?
My take is still the same as my comment above. I’m not convinced introducing an inconsistently used macro, to essentially save some line length, is a huge win. In general I prefer that we are explicit/verbose when it comes to anything build system related.
DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Aug 18, 2020DrahtBot commented at 4:36 am on August 18, 2020: member🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase.
Want to unsubscribe from rebase notifications on this pull request? Just convert this pull request to a “draft”.
vasild commented at 7:03 am on August 18, 2020: memberClosing this because it needs frequent rebasing and it is not moving anywhere.
It has 4 “Concept ACK” and 1 “Concept ~0”.
The point of this PR is to save repetitions, not line length. The introduced macro is not used everywhere (to replace
AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG
), but on the places where it is used the usage is consistent.If there is interest in this, I would be happy to reopen and rebase it.
vasild closed this on Aug 18, 2020
DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-17 09:12 UTC
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me