script, doc: guix tidy-ups #22527

1. 
   jonatack commented at 10:11 am on July 22, 2021: member
2. script, doc: guix touchups dced8b5266
3. 
   fanquake commented at 10:13 am on July 22, 2021: member

   A bunch of these are being done in #22511.
4. 
   jonatack commented at 10:14 am on July 22, 2021: member

   Most of them aren’t.
5. 
   fanquake commented at 10:16 am on July 22, 2021: member

   Probably easiest to point out the few additional typos in that PR. Then we can just backport 2 commits.
6. hebasto approved
7. 
   hebasto commented at 10:17 am on July 22, 2021: member

   ACK dced8b5266d013da2ddc0a2d907dcf864e914bc1
8. 
   hebasto commented at 10:22 am on July 22, 2021: member

   Probably easiest to point out the few additional typos in that PR. Then we can just backport 2 commits.

   Agree. Also #22511 (comment)

9. 
   jonatack commented at 10:27 am on July 22, 2021: member

   Most of these suggestions aren’t in the current version of #22511 and that PR is about something else. But ok :man_shrugging:
10. jonatack closed this on Jul 22, 2021

    ---

11. 
    fanquake commented at 12:05 pm on July 22, 2021: member

    There’s enough overlap to combine them into one, and some of the changes here were already pointed out in a comment in that PR. Some of the changes here are also not correct. i.e the sig files are called noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS, so updating the error messages to call them non-codesigned.SHA256SUMS is not right.
12. DrahtBot locked this on Aug 16, 2022

Contributors
jonatack fanquake hebasto