This rebases and revises #16003 for clarity of review.
Aims to fix #18911.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
Type | Reviewers |
---|---|
Concept ACK | fjahr, TheCharlatan |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
935+ }
936
937-#ifdef USE_POLL
938- int fd_max = nFD;
939-#else
940- int fd_max = FD_SETSIZE;
FD_SETSIZE
completely out of the equation in the commit description.
Concept ACK
First three commits look good, but the last one needs more descriptions and comments as mentioned by fjahr.
🤔 There hasn’t been much activity lately and the CI seems to be failing.
If no one reviewed the current pull request by commit hash, a rebase can be considered. While the CI failure may be a false positive, the CI hasn’t been running for some time, so there may be a real issue hiding as well. A rebase triggers the latest CI and makes sure that no silent merge conflicts have snuck in.
Co-authored-by: tryphe <tryphe@noreply.github.com>
And fix the amount of descriptors requested
Co-authored-by: tryphe <tryphe@noreply.github.com>