-Wshadow
in #29485, see the commit messages
for the associated compiler message.
refactor: Remove redundant definitions #29492
pull Empact wants to merge 4 commits into bitcoin:master from Empact:redundant-definitions changing 4 files +5 −10-
Empact commented at 5:08 pm on February 27, 2024: contributorThese were identified via
-
DrahtBot commented at 5:08 pm on February 27, 2024: contributor
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
Code Coverage & Benchmarks
For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/29492.
Reviews
See the guideline for information on the review process.
Type Reviewers Concept NACK maflcko If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Conflicts
No conflicts as of last run.
-
DrahtBot added the label Refactoring on Feb 27, 2024
-
in src/common/init.cpp:73 in b1fe46a4cd outdated
69@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ std::optional<ConfigError> InitConfig(ArgsManager& args, SettingsAbortFn setting 70 const std::string config_source = cli_config_path.empty() 71 ? strprintf("data directory %s", fs::quoted(fs::PathToString(orig_datadir_path))) 72 : strprintf("command line argument %s", fs::quoted("-conf=" + cli_config_path)); 73- const std::string error = strprintf( 74+ error = strprintf(
maflcko commented at 5:28 pm on February 27, 2024:not sure. Shadowing is a side effect of the effort to limit the scope of a symbol to a smaller scope. I don’t think re-using a symbol of the outer scope is the correct solution, merely because it happens to have the same name and type.Empact force-pushed on Feb 27, 2024Empact commented at 11:11 pm on February 27, 2024: contributorMy inclination would be to fix the-Wshadow
warnings over the course of several PRs (to ease review/minimize conflicts), then add the warning to one of the CI runs to guard against introduction, while leaving it disabled by default to avoid other incidental disruption.DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Apr 19, 2024DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Apr 23, 2024achow101 commented at 2:37 pm on October 15, 2024: memberAre you still working on this?in src/net_processing.cpp:3072 in da188bf523 outdated
3036@@ -3037,8 +3037,6 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::ProcessOrphanTx(Peer& peer) 3037 AssertLockHeld(g_msgproc_mutex); 3038 LOCK(cs_main); 3039 3040- CTransactionRef porphanTx = nullptr;
maflcko commented at 2:39 pm on October 15, 2024:I wonder why clang-tidy can’t pick this one up. Ref: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31051/files
fanquake commented at 6:38 pm on February 20, 2025:Maybe we can circle back with a future version.DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Oct 29, 2024refactor: Don't redundantly define error in common/init.cpp
common/init.cpp:73:31: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow] const std::string error = strprintf( ^ common/init.cpp:37:21: note: previous declaration is here std::string error; ^
refactor: Don't redundantly define porphanTx in net_processing.cpp
net_processing.cpp:3042:28: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow] while (CTransactionRef porphanTx = m_orphanage.GetTxToReconsider(peer.m_id)) { ^ net_processing.cpp:3040:21: note: previous declaration is here CTransactionRef porphanTx = nullptr; ^
refactor: Don't redundantly define TxItems in wallet/wallet.cpp
wallet/wallet.cpp:901:48: error: declaration shadows a typedef in 'wallet::CWallet' [-Werror,-Wshadow] typedef std::multimap<int64_t, CWalletTx*> TxItems; ^ ./wallet/wallet.h:483:48: note: previous declaration is here typedef std::multimap<int64_t, CWalletTx*> TxItems; ^
test: Don't redundantly define msg in key_tests
test/key_tests.cpp:184:21: error: declaration shadows a local variable [-Werror,-Wshadow] std::string msg = "A message to be signed" + ToString(i); ^ test/key_tests.cpp:161:17: note: previous declaration is here std::string msg = "A message to be signed"; ^
Empact force-pushed on Jan 26, 2025DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jan 26, 2025DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Jan 26, 2025DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Feb 3, 2025maflcko commented at 3:55 pm on February 14, 2025: membertend towards NACK, without a motivation (example of a real bug that this prevents or prevented):
- Given a motivation, it should be enforced with clang-tidy (or otherwise)
- Without motivation, it shouldn’t be enforced, nor should the changes be made in the first place
fanquake commented at 6:38 pm on February 20, 2025: memberClosing for now.fanquake closed this on Feb 20, 2025
github-metadata-mirror
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2025-07-10 21:13 UTC
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2025-07-10 21:13 UTC
This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me