sign: don’t assume we are parsing a sane TapMiniscript #29853

pull darosior wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from darosior:2404_miniscript_crash changing 2 files +25 −1
  1. darosior commented at 2:11 pm on April 11, 2024: member

    The script provided for signature might be externally provided, for instance by way of ‘finalizepsbt’. Therefore the script might be ill-crafted, so don’t assume pubkeys are always 32 bytes.

    Thanks to Niklas for finding this.

    FIxes #29851.

  2. DrahtBot commented at 2:11 pm on April 11, 2024: contributor

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Code Coverage

    For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

    Reviews

    See the guideline for information on the review process.

    Type Reviewers
    ACK achow101, furszy
    Stale ACK dergoegge

    If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

  3. fanquake added the label Needs backport (27.x) on Apr 11, 2024
  4. darosior referenced this in commit be9802b237 on Apr 11, 2024
  5. dergoegge approved
  6. dergoegge commented at 9:05 am on April 12, 2024: member
    utACK bdf2ef2c94cae2b0e2cdac1866322b4f9f7c7a7b
  7. achow101 requested review from achow101 on Apr 12, 2024
  8. in src/test/script_tests.cpp:1278 in bdf2ef2c94 outdated
    1273+    prev.vout.emplace_back(0, GetScriptForDestination(builder.GetOutput()));
    1274+    curr.vin.emplace_back(COutPoint{prev.GetHash(), 0});
    1275+    sig_data.tr_spenddata = builder.GetSpendData();
    1276+
    1277+    // SignSignature can fail but it shouldn't raise an exception (nor crash).
    1278+    SignSignature(keystore, CTransaction(prev), curr, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, sig_data);
    


    achow101 commented at 5:40 pm on April 15, 2024:

    I think it would be good to check that SignSignature fails here:

    0    BOOST_CHECK(!SignSignature(keystore, CTransaction(prev), curr, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, sig_data));
    

    darosior commented at 4:24 pm on April 22, 2024:
    I think it emphases the wrong thing: we are not testing it’s failing, we are testing it’s not crashing. That’s why i didn’t do it. Anyways it’s not really important and there is already a comment highlighting this. Done.
  9. sign: don't assume we are parsing a sane Miniscript
    The script provided for signature might be externally provided, for
    instance by way of 'finalizepsbt'. Therefore the script might be
    ill-crafted, so don't assume pubkeys are always 32 bytes.
    
    Thanks to Niklas for finding this.
    4d8d21320e
  10. darosior force-pushed on Apr 22, 2024
  11. DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Apr 22, 2024
  12. DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Apr 23, 2024
  13. achow101 commented at 7:41 pm on April 23, 2024: member
    ACK 4d8d21320eba54571ff63931509cd515c3e20339
  14. DrahtBot requested review from dergoegge on Apr 23, 2024
  15. furszy commented at 8:56 pm on April 23, 2024: member

    ACK 4d8d21320eba54571ff63931509cd515c3e20339 with a small nuance that could be tackled in a follow-up by someone else (or never).

    As this was found by the RPC fuzzer, it would be nice to re-use those inputs and craft a functional test, rather than covering it on a unit test. This is because functional tests can be ported across releases with the bug fix, while unit tests might not be easy to port due to some internal changes. Plus, in the long term, unit tests require more maintenance work.

  16. fanquake merged this on Apr 24, 2024
  17. fanquake closed this on Apr 24, 2024

  18. fanquake referenced this in commit ae9a2ed40a on Apr 24, 2024
  19. fanquake removed the label Needs backport (27.x) on Apr 24, 2024
  20. fanquake commented at 1:18 pm on April 24, 2024: member
    Backported to 27.x in #29888.
  21. luke-jr referenced this in commit 8a8dd1c444 on Apr 24, 2024
  22. fanquake referenced this in commit c7885ecd77 on May 13, 2024
  23. glozow referenced this in commit fe98e9c8de on May 13, 2024
  24. glozow commented at 9:43 am on May 14, 2024: member
    backported to 26.x in #29899
  25. darosior deleted the branch on May 14, 2024

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-23 09:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me