build: Add missing USDT header dependency to kernel #30970

pull theuni wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from theuni:fix-kernel-no-usdt changing 1 files +1 −0
  1. theuni commented at 4:26 pm on September 25, 2024: member

    Noticed while testing a branch that replaces boost::multi_index with a custom replacement.

    Currently depends builds pick up usdt and boost from the same path, and because boost always exists, the usdt path is implicitly included. So without boost, USDT isn’t found.

    An alternative to this would be to disable USDT for the kernel. I’d be open to either approach.

  2. build: Add missing USDT header dependency to kernel ccd10fdb97
  3. DrahtBot commented at 4:26 pm on September 25, 2024: contributor

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Code Coverage

    For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

    Reviews

    See the guideline for information on the review process.

    Type Reviewers
    ACK hebasto, fanquake
    Concept ACK TheCharlatan

    If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #28690 (build: Introduce internal kernel library by TheCharlatan)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  4. DrahtBot added the label Build system on Sep 25, 2024
  5. theuni commented at 4:26 pm on September 25, 2024: member
  6. TheCharlatan commented at 7:42 pm on September 25, 2024: contributor

    Concept ACK

    Good find, I think just including it like you’ve done here is ok for now.

  7. maflcko added the label DrahtBot Guix build requested on Sep 26, 2024
  8. maflcko removed the label DrahtBot Guix build requested on Sep 26, 2024
  9. hebasto approved
  10. hebasto commented at 10:42 am on September 26, 2024: member

    ACK ccd10fdb97f9b8268a5cd60d7461967cfe536f16, the diff looks correct.

    Ideally, such changes should be enforced by a failure to compile:

    0/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/src/util/trace.h:12:10: fatal error: sys/sdt.h: No such file or directory
    1    8 | #include <sys/sdt.h>
    2      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~
    3compilation terminated.
    

    However, when building with depends, the compiler is still able to include a system-wide header:

    0$ sudo apt install systemtap-sdt-dev
    1$ make -C depends NO_QT=1 NO_WALLET=1 NO_ZMQ=1 NO_NATPMP=1 NO_UPNP=1
    2$ cmake -B build --toolchain depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/toolchain.cmake -DBUILD_KERNEL_LIB=ON
    3$ rm -rf depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include/sys
    4$ cmake --build build  # no compiler errors
    
  11. DrahtBot requested review from TheCharlatan on Sep 26, 2024
  12. DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Sep 29, 2024
  13. DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Sep 29, 2024
  14. fanquake commented at 11:13 am on October 11, 2024: member

    Currently depends builds pick up usdt and boost from the same path, and because boost always exists, the usdt path is implicitly included. So without boost, USDT isn’t found.

    To clarify for myself, the build currently picks up all depends dependencies from the same path (i.e something like -isystem /root/ci_scratch/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include, (which is what is introduced with the change here)), so using any dependency will implictly include all others. It’s just the case that the kernel only had two, and it was also possible that if the depends -isystem was missing, it could be masked by the fact that a system installed usdt, happens to exist alongside libc, and such will also always be included, so no compile failure.

    Ideally, such changes should be enforced by a failure to compile: However, when building with depends, the compiler is still able to include a system-wide header:

    Are you saying you think we shouldn’t be able to include system headers when building using depends? It’s not clear how that’d work, unless we started vendoring our own libc/c++ etc.

  15. hebasto commented at 12:34 pm on October 11, 2024: member

    Are you saying you think we shouldn’t be able to include system headers when building using depends?

    Yes, for headers-only packages built in depends, such as Boost and USDT. It’s for the same reason, why we got rid of the ALLOW_HOST_PACKAGES variable.

  16. fanquake commented at 12:41 pm on October 11, 2024: member

    Yes, for headers-only packages built in depends, such as Boost and USDT.

    Headers-only shouldn’t make any difference here, and this should already be the case for Boost. If it’s not, that should be fixed. See my point above re USDT, I don’t understand how you propose to do this, given that the USDT headers exist amongst the libc headers.

  17. fanquake approved
  18. fanquake commented at 12:43 pm on October 11, 2024: member
    ACK ccd10fdb97f9b8268a5cd60d7461967cfe536f16
  19. fanquake merged this on Oct 11, 2024
  20. fanquake closed this on Oct 11, 2024


github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-21 09:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me