Followup to #31397.
Addressing (in order): #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31658#pullrequestreview-2551617694 #31397 (review)
Followup to #31397.
Addressing (in order): #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31397 (review) #31658#pullrequestreview-2551617694 #31397 (review)
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/31666.
See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.
No conflicts as of last run.
The txrequest fuzzer uses uint256s, not transactions, so it's best if
GetCandidatePeers takes that as an input.
Otherwise, it is not meaningful to test whether the announcement is
ignored, because *all* announcements of this type are ignored.