test: remove appveyor reference in comment #34609

1. 
   m3dwards commented at 10:29 pm on February 17, 2026: contributor

   Appveyor is not longer used however the test still requires to check for permissions including 666 as otherwise the tests fail on Windows

   Fixes: #32576

2. test: remove appveyor reference in comment

   Appveyor is not longer used however the test still requires to check for
   permissions including 666 as otherwise the tests fail on Windows

   80208d5552
3. DrahtBot added the label Tests on Feb 17, 2026
4. 
   DrahtBot commented at 10:29 pm on February 17, 2026: contributor

   The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

   Reviews

   See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

   LLM Linter (✨ experimental)

   Possible typos and grammar issues:

   • “666 is for on Windows.” -> “666 is for Windows” [preposition error; “for on” is redundant/incorrect]
   • “666 is for on Windows.” -> “666 is for Windows” [preposition error; “for on” is redundant/incorrect]

   2026-02-17 22:29:30

5. in test/functional/tool_wallet.py:161 in 80208d5552

   157@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ def test_tool_wallet_info(self):
   158         #
   159         # self.log.debug('Setting wallet file permissions to 400 (read-only)')
   160         # os.chmod(self.wallet_path, stat.S_IRUSR)
   161-        # assert self.wallet_permissions() in ['400', '666'] # Sanity check. 666 because Appveyor.
   162+        # assert self.wallet_permissions() in ['400', '666'] # Sanity check. 666 is for on Windows.
   

   ---

   ---

   

   chriszeng1010 commented at 10:59 pm on February 17, 2026:

   This is not grammatically correct.
6. 
   chriszeng1010 commented at 11:00 pm on February 17, 2026: none

   Comment is grammatically incorrect.

Contributors
m3dwards DrahtBot chriszeng1010

Labels
Tests