[should fail] depends: Boost 1.91.0-1 #35147

https://www.boost.org/releases/1.91.0/.

MultiIndex

Breaking change: All type lists accepted or provided by the library (indexed_by, tag, nested typedefs index_specifier_type_list, index_type_list, iterator_type_list and const_iterator_type_list) are no longer based on Boost.MPL but instead they are now Boost.Mp11 lists. As a result, Boost.MultiIndex doesn’t depend anymore on Boost.MPL. It is expected that most user code won’t be impacted by this change, but the previous behavior may be restored, however, by globally defining the macro BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_MPL_SUPPORT. Legacy support for Boost.MPL may be eventually deprecated and removed in the future.

Breaking change: composite_key and associated class templates (composite_key_equal_to, composite_key_compare, composite_key_hash) have been made variadic (previously the maximum number of template arguments was limited by BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_LIMIT_COMPOSITE_KEY_SIZE). This change should be transparent to users, with the exception that composite_key::key_extractors returns a std::tuple instead of a boost::tuple (and similarly for the rest of affected class templates).

Removed internal workarounds and fallbacks to support pre-C++11 compilers.

<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

<!--021abf342d371248e50ceaed478a90ca-->

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

<!--5faf32d7da4f0f540f40219e4f7537a3-->

<!--85328a0da195eb286784d51f73fa0af9-->

🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. _{Task 32 bit ARM: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/actions/runs/24869904274/job/72813921619} _{LLM reason (✨ experimental): CI failed at build time due to C++ compilation errors in src/txmempool.h (Boost multi_index get<index_by_wtxid> template misuse and missing m_entry_vec symbol).}

<details><summary>Hints</summary>

Try to run the tests locally, according to the documentation. However, a CI failure may still happen due to a number of reasons, for example:

• Possibly due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest commit of the target branch.

• A sanitizer issue, which can only be found by compiling with the sanitizer and running the affected test.

• An intermittent issue.

Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

</details>

<strike>I think you forgot to copy the required headers? The update should be transparent. At least it seems to be passing in https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/24873579092/job/72825220909#step:3:49 , but maybe I am missing something?

I think you forgot to copy the required headers? The update should be transparent. At least it seems to be passing in https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/24873579092/job/72825220909#step:3:49 , but maybe I am missing something?

That CI job is still using Boost 1.90.

https://www.boost.org/releases/1.91.0/.

MultiIndex

Breaking change: All type lists accepted or provided by the library (indexed_by, tag, nested typedefs index_specifier_type_list, index_type_list, iterator_type_list and const_iterator_type_list) are no longer based on Boost.MPL but instead they are now Boost.Mp11 lists. As a result, Boost.MultiIndex doesn’t depend anymore on Boost.MPL. It is expected that most user code won’t be impacted by this change, but the previous behavior may be restored, however, by globally defining the macro BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_MPL_SUPPORT. Legacy support for Boost.MPL may be eventually deprecated and removed in the future.

Breaking change: composite_key and associated class templates (composite_key_equal_to, composite_key_compare, composite_key_hash) have been made variadic (previously the maximum number of template arguments was limited by BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_LIMIT_COMPOSITE_KEY_SIZE). This change should be transparent to users, with the exception that composite_key::key_extractors returns a std::tuple instead of a boost::tuple (and similarly for the rest of affected class templates).

Removed internal workarounds and fallbacks to support pre-C++11 compilers.

Globally defining the BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_MPL_SUPPORT macro seems not working as expected.

Update: See here and here.