ci: side-effects from #33362 #35416

issue fanquake opened this issue on May 29, 2026
  1. fanquake added the label Brainstorming on May 29, 2026
  2. fanquake commented at 5:16 PM on May 29, 2026: member

    cc @vasild

  3. willcl-ark commented at 7:13 PM on May 29, 2026: member

    Fixes I can think of:

    • revert #33362 (and lose its test coverage)
    • ~use (and cleanup!) per-container networks~
    • use dynamic IPs and pass them in to tests (least favourite)

    ~I think I would tent towards using a network per-container. It will only be "messy" if we don't tidy them up properly. We don't currently clean up networks ever (and I ∴ always have two lurking in docker network ls), and perhaps we should be, anyway.~

    actually I don't think 2) will work even, as the networks will still overlap :(


github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-05-31 17:50 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me