wallet, rpc: Add listrawtransactions RPC #35813

Add a new listrawtransactions RPC that returns wallet transactions without logical interpretation. Unlike listtransactions, which only lists transactions with an economic category (sends to external addresses, receives from outside), this RPC returns every transaction the wallet knows about — including consolidations and self-transfers that would otherwise be invisible.

Each transaction appears exactly once with its net wallet balance change (amount) and, when the wallet funded the transaction, the fee paid (fee). Pagination is supported via count and skip parameters, matching the interface of listtransactions.

Next possible follow-ups:

• A filter parameter ("all" / "received" / "sent" / "self") once per-tx semantics are agreed on
• Some fields inherited from TransactionDescriptionString() carry references to category (e.g. replaced_by_txid, parent_descs) which don't apply here — could be cleaned up in a separate pass

Closes #34632.

Previous attempt: #35009 (by alfonsoromanz), closed in favour of a separate RPC as suggested by achow101.

<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

<!--006a51241073e994b41acfe9ec718e94-->

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/35813.

<!--021abf342d371248e50ceaed478a90ca-->

Reviews

See the guideline and AI policy for information on the review process.

If your review is incorrectly listed, please copy-paste <code>&lt;!--meta-tag:bot-skip--&gt;</code> into the comment that the bot should ignore.

<!--5faf32d7da4f0f540f40219e4f7537a3-->

LLM Linter (✨ experimental)

Possible places where named args for integral literals may be used (e.g. func(x, /*named_arg=*/0) in C++, and func(x, named_arg=0) in Python):

• assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Negative count", self.nodes[0].listrawtransactions, -1) in test/functional/wallet_listrawtransactions.py
• assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Negative from", self.nodes[0].listrawtransactions, 10, -1) in test/functional/wallet_listrawtransactions.py

Possible places where comparison-specific test macros should replace generic comparisons:

• [test/functional/wallet_listrawtransactions.py] assert entry["amount"] > 0 -> use assert_greater_than(entry["amount"], 0) for a clearer comparison-specific failure.
• [test/functional/wallet_listrawtransactions.py] assert total >= 3, f"Need at least 3 txs for pagination test, got {total}" -> use assert_greater_than_or_equal(total, 3) instead.

^{2026-07-28 00:39:36}

<!--85328a0da195eb286784d51f73fa0af9-->

🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. _{Task lint: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/actions/runs/30211957111/job/89819583780} _{LLM reason (✨ experimental): CI failed because the lint test lint-files.py reported an executable-permission mismatch: test/functional/wallet_listrawtransactions.py has shebang but mode 644 instead of required 755.}

<details><summary>Hints</summary>

Try to run the tests locally, according to the documentation. However, a CI failure may still happen due to a number of reasons, for example:

• Possibly due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest commit of the target branch.

• A sanitizer issue, which can only be found by compiling with the sanitizer and running the affected test.

• An intermittent issue.

Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

</details>

-<ins>Updates</ins>:

• Added release notes.

Concept ACK.

-<ins>Updates</ins>:

• Added a test for a coinbase tx.