The current source files in test/ do not have a license, so they are fully copyrighted.
I'd like to request MIT license be added so that other bitcoin implementations can use the same unit test values as the reference client.
The current source files in test/ do not have a license, so they are fully copyrighted.
I'd like to request MIT license be added so that other bitcoin implementations can use the same unit test values as the reference client.
My contributions to bitcoin in that folder are licensed under MIT.
I think this was the intention all along. I agree we should fix this.
Git blame (for the json files) says for maximum prudence we should also get confirmation from CodeShark, gavinandresen, sipa, petertodd, wumpus, grau.
I agree with MIT license for these files.
confirmed
To be clear: gmaxwell's list of people only includes those who wrote json data for tests, not the tests themselves.
I'm fine with MIT license for all my contributions as well.
ACK MIT
ACK MIT
ACK MIT
ACK MIT. Or whatever. Do people really worry about stuff like this?
ACK MIT
@gavinandresen People have to "worry" about stuff like this in most jurisdictions...
@luke-jr No need to start an argument. Even if it's pointless to get confirmation, its stupidly cheap to do... and acts as a kind of group confirmation of conscientiousness: "We make an effort to produce software which is high quality in every way".
ACK
I'd recommend a LICENSE file in src/test/data and
<pre> // Copyright (c) 2009-2013 The Bitcoin developers // Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying // file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. </pre>
in the source files in src/test/ ?