Follow up of #6097?
Not sure what we are doing right now, but it is no longer a subtree.
[ci skip]
0 | @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@ 1 | Regression tests 2 | ================ 3 | 4 | -### [python-bitcoinrpc](https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinrpc) 5 | -Git subtree of [https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinrpc](https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinrpc). 6 | -Changes to python-bitcoinrpc should be made upstream, and then 7 | -pulled here using git subtree. 8 | +### [test_framework](test_framework) 9 | +This contains some files of the [python-bitcoinrpc by jgarzik](https://github.com/jgarzik/python-bitcoinrpc).
Only some files are taken from python-bitcoinrpc, I think the python test-framework code was originally written by @gavinandresen (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4485). IMO we should remove the description for the test_framework folder itself.
@jonasschnelli @jgarzik I think it's only authproxy.py
So I addressed that, I guess.
I'm happy to sync up, however, as @jonasschnelli says, only some of the files are from python-bitcoinrpc.
* Only authproxy.py is taken from the python-bitcoinrpc
ACK
ACK
On Thursday, November 19, 2015, Jonas Schnelli notifications@github.com wrote:
ACK
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #7052 (comment).
Right. What we use amounts to only one file (authproxy.py), and it is a very stable library, so it is easier to just copy it and make it part of the test framework than keep around a subtree. The subtree needed a circuitous work-around (updating sys.path) to use it in place.