[0.15] Final to-do's for 0.15.0 release notes #11280

pull meshcollider wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:0.15 from meshcollider:201709_release_note_015_todo changing 1 files +22 −1
  1. meshcollider commented at 11:01 PM on September 7, 2017: contributor

    Closes #11174

    I may have missed things that should be included, happy to amend :)

  2. laanwj added the label Docs and Output on Sep 7, 2017
  3. laanwj commented at 11:26 PM on September 7, 2017: member

    Concept ACK (never mind the travis fail, I cancelled travis here to save resources)

  4. in doc/release-notes.md:70 in 883be25933 outdated
      65 | +wallet support, is coming in a next version.
      66 | +
      67 | +Rescanning with encrypted wallets
      68 | +---------------------------------
      69 | +
      70 | +When using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking the wallet. This means that
    


    instagibbs commented at 11:37 PM on September 7, 2017:

    might want to note this is not a regression, right?

  5. in doc/release-notes.md:64 in 883be25933 outdated
      59 | +Current SegWit Support
      60 | +----------------------
      61 | +
      62 | +Version 0.15.0 supports adding a segregated witness address via the `addwitnessaddress` RPC, but
      63 | +please note that this is a testing/expert RPC, which does not guarantee recovery from backup. Only use
      64 | +this RPC if you know what you are doing. More complete support for segregated witness, including
    


    sipa commented at 11:39 PM on September 7, 2017:

    "including wallet support" sounds like there are other things missing. It's the only thing...

  6. in doc/release-notes.md:72 in 883be25933 outdated
      67 | +Rescanning with encrypted wallets
      68 | +---------------------------------
      69 | +
      70 | +When using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking the wallet. This means that
      71 | +currently, in order to recover from a backup of an encrypted HD wallet, the user must unlock the wallet with a
      72 | +really long time out and manually trigger a rescan with `-rescan`, otherwise they risk missing some keys when
    


    gmaxwell commented at 11:40 PM on September 7, 2017:

    Rescan rpc (or command in the gui debug console). ... if you restart with -rescan you'll be relocked!


    meshcollider commented at 11:49 PM on September 7, 2017:

    Oops, fixed, thanks

  7. fanquake added this to the milestone 0.15.0 on Sep 7, 2017
  8. instagibbs commented at 11:56 PM on September 7, 2017: member

    I don't think we have that RPC call, outside of importing a private key or something like that?

    On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell notifications@github.com wrote:

    @gmaxwell commented on this pull request.

    In doc/release-notes.md https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11280#discussion_r137681362:

    +================

    • +Current SegWit Support +----------------------
    • +Version 0.15.0 supports adding a segregated witness address via the addwitnessaddress RPC, but +please note that this is a testing/expert RPC, which does not guarantee recovery from backup. Only use +this RPC if you know what you are doing. More complete support for segregated witness, including +wallet support, is coming in a next version.
    • +Rescanning with encrypted wallets +---------------------------------
    • +When using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking the wallet. This means that +currently, in order to recover from a backup of an encrypted HD wallet, the user must unlock the wallet with a +really long time out and manually trigger a rescan with -rescan, otherwise they risk missing some keys when

    Rescan rpc (or command in the gui debug console). ... if you restart with -rescan you'll be relocked!

    — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11280#pullrequestreview-61381630, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFgC0w3zgsdKF6NT7LjHMF3oL8MT8xD5ks5sgH9FgaJpZM4PQfrG .

  9. in doc/release-notes.md:59 in 5e88581bb6 outdated
      52 | @@ -53,6 +53,27 @@ the Linux kernel, macOS 10.8+, and Windows Vista and later. Windows XP is not su
      53 |  Bitcoin Core should also work on most other Unix-like systems but is not
      54 |  frequently tested on them.
      55 |  
      56 | +Notes for 0.15.0
      57 | +================
      58 | +
      59 | +Current SegWit Support
    


    fanquake commented at 9:04 AM on September 8, 2017:

    nit s/Support/support


    meshcollider commented at 11:46 AM on September 8, 2017:

    Fixed, although title capitalisation is a bit inconsistent already in the file

  10. in doc/release-notes.md:65 in 5e88581bb6 outdated
      60 | +----------------------
      61 | +
      62 | +Version 0.15.0 supports adding a segregated witness address via the `addwitnessaddress` RPC, but
      63 | +please note that this is a testing/expert RPC, which does not guarantee recovery from backup. Only use
      64 | +this RPC if you know what you are doing. More complete wallet support for segregated witness is coming
      65 | +in a next version.
    


    fanquake commented at 9:07 AM on September 8, 2017:

    Is this going to be in a point release, or 0.16.0 ? I think we should mention which here, because one could be a month away, while the other is 6 months or more. If not, instead of "is coming in a next version.", maybe just "will be available shortly." ?


    meshcollider commented at 9:54 AM on September 8, 2017:

    Segwit wallet support is aimed for 0.15.1 I believe? Also to me, "will be available shortly." sounds like it will somehow be added to 0.15.0, I like the emphasis on the new version


    gmaxwell commented at 6:17 PM on September 8, 2017:

    meshcollider is correct.

  11. in doc/release-notes.md:72 in 5e88581bb6 outdated
      67 | +Rescanning with encrypted wallets
      68 | +---------------------------------
      69 | +
      70 | +As in previous versions, when using an encrypted HD wallet, the keypool cannot be topped up without unlocking
      71 | +the wallet. This means that currently, in order to recover from a backup of an encrypted HD wallet, the user
      72 | +must unlock the wallet with a really long time out and manually trigger a rescan, otherwise they risk missing
    


    flack commented at 9:27 AM on September 8, 2017:

    time out => timeout


    meshcollider commented at 11:48 AM on September 8, 2017:

    Fixed

  12. instagibbs commented at 9:29 PM on September 8, 2017: member
  13. sipa commented at 9:31 PM on September 8, 2017: member

    ACK; needs rebase to fix travis

  14. Add segwit and rescan notes to 0.15 release notes 93e2e5c269
  15. laanwj commented at 10:27 PM on September 10, 2017: member

    This has missed the 0.15.0 final tag, forgot about this one, sorry!

  16. laanwj commented at 11:44 PM on September 10, 2017: member

    Keeping this open for now, I'll see if I can still include this in the release notes uploaded to bitcoin.org etc.

  17. dooglus commented at 6:27 PM on September 12, 2017: contributor

    maximumCount - a number specifying the minimum number of UTXOs

    This seems wrong. Doc string says:

          "maximumCount"     (numeric or string, default=unlimited) **Maximum** number of UTXOs
  18. laanwj commented at 1:02 PM on September 14, 2017: member

    Closing, this is now part of the 0.15.0 release notes on master.

    This seems wrong. Doc string says:

    Did not see this remark soon enough, so could not take this into account.

  19. laanwj closed this on Sep 14, 2017

  20. meshcollider deleted the branch on Sep 14, 2017
  21. DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-04-13 15:15 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me