Broken out of #30454 . Bumped even further after https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/98 was merged upstream.
hebasto Presumably this approach works now with the CMake branch?
Broken out of #30454 . Bumped even further after https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/98 was merged upstream.
hebasto Presumably this approach works now with the CMake branch?
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
Type | Reviewers |
---|---|
ACK | ryanofsky |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Presumably this approach works now with the CMake branch?
Unfortunately, it doesn’t.
The PR30454 branch rebased on the master branch @ efeb39785aeee9130584b865d886c6b46e59f147 fails:
0$ make -C depends NO_QT=1 NO_WALLET=1 NO_UPNP=1 NO_NATPMP=1 NO_ZMQ=1 NO_USDT=1 MULTIPROCESS=1
1$ cmake -B build --toolchain depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/toolchain.cmake
2...
3CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:158 (find_package):
4 Could not find a package configuration file provided by
5 "LibmultiprocessGen" with any of the following names:
6
7 LibmultiprocessGenConfig.cmake
8 libmultiprocessgen-config.cmake
I will look for a solution in the upstream repository.
UPD. https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/98#issuecomment-2241236657
theuni
DrahtBot
ryanofsky
hebasto
Labels
Build system