Broken out of #30454 . Bumped even further after https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/98 was merged upstream.
hebasto Presumably this approach works now with the CMake branch?
Broken out of #30454 . Bumped even further after https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/98 was merged upstream.
hebasto Presumably this approach works now with the CMake branch?
<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
<!--006a51241073e994b41acfe9ec718e94-->
For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.
<!--021abf342d371248e50ceaed478a90ca-->
See the guideline for information on the review process.
| Type | Reviewers |
|---|---|
| ACK | ryanofsky |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Ping @ryanofsky for a quick concept ACK for bumping to this particular commit.
Presumably this approach works now with the CMake branch?
Unfortunately, it doesn't.
The PR30454 branch rebased on the master branch @ efeb39785aeee9130584b865d886c6b46e59f147 fails:
$ make -C depends NO_QT=1 NO_WALLET=1 NO_UPNP=1 NO_NATPMP=1 NO_ZMQ=1 NO_USDT=1 MULTIPROCESS=1
$ cmake -B build --toolchain depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/toolchain.cmake
...
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:158 (find_package):
Could not find a package configuration file provided by
"LibmultiprocessGen" with any of the following names:
LibmultiprocessGenConfig.cmake
libmultiprocessgen-config.cmake
I will look for a solution in the upstream repository.
UPD. https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/98#issuecomment-2241236657
Ported to the CMake-based build system in https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/277.