[29.x] More backports #35899

pull fanquake wants to merge 3 commits into bitcoin:29.x from fanquake:more_29_x_backports changing 5 files +18 −65

fanquake commented at 2:56 PM on August 5, 2026: member
Backports:
- #35691
- #35766

chainparams: delete my DNS seed

Github-Pull: #35691
Rebased-From: d9080639804187601a84bad18582e7afb93101c3

0ae49ea16a

p2p: Assume v2transport for addresses from seeds

By now, the vast majority of nodes in the network supports BIP324.
Even if the optimistic guess would turn out to be wrong for a given
node, we would just reconnect with v1.
This is better than making v1 connections with peers when both nodes support v2.

Github-Pull: #35766
Rebased-From: cf0f2aeae009c98615bffd4dafd74e46f20a0ae6

43f0653abc

doc: update release notes for v29.x 2f67f08ea0
DrahtBot added the label Backport on Aug 5, 2026
DrahtBot commented at 2:57 PM on August 5, 2026: contributor



The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.



Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/35899.



Reviews

See the guideline and AI policy for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.
l0rinc commented at 10:20 PM on August 7, 2026: contributor

Can we backport #35670?

Contributors

Labels

Linked (view graph)

#35691 chainparams: delete my DNS seed #35766 p2p: Assume v2transport for addresses from seeds

[29.x] More backports #35899

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

Reviews