build: macOS toolchain update #16392

pull fanquake wants to merge 3 commits into bitcoin:master from fanquake:macos-toolchain-update changing 9 files +166 −128
  1. fanquake commented at 6:58 am on July 15, 2019: member

    TLDR: This updates our macOS toolchain to use a newer version of Clang, cctools (including new dependency on libtapi), LD64 and the macOS SDK.

    I’ve been testing depends builds (HOST=x86_64-apple-darwin16) inside a Debian Buster Docker container, and running the resultant bitcoind and bitcoin-qt binaries on a macOS 10.14.4 system. The .dmg generated by a make deploy also mounts correctly on the same macOS system.

    Clang

    Upgraded from 3.7.1 to 6.0.1

    cctools

    See tpoechtrager/cctools-port and tpoechtrager/apple-libtapi.

    macOS SDK

    Upgraded from building against the macOS 10.11 SDK to the macOS 10.14 SDK.

    TODO

    • Make the 10.14 SDK available to Travis.

    Fixes: #16052 Closes: #14797

  2. fanquake added the label macOS on Jul 15, 2019
  3. fanquake added the label Build system on Jul 15, 2019
  4. fanquake added the label Needs gitian build on Jul 15, 2019
  5. fanquake added the label Needs Conceptual Review on Jul 15, 2019
  6. fanquake added this to the milestone 0.19.0 on Jul 15, 2019
  7. fanquake requested review from theuni on Jul 15, 2019
  8. fanquake requested review from dongcarl on Jul 15, 2019
  9. DrahtBot commented at 7:21 am on July 15, 2019: member

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #17919 (depends: Allow building with system clang by dongcarl)
    • #15441 ([doc] build: warn against spaces in working directory by Sjors)
    • #12557 ([WIP] 64 bit iOS device support by Sjors)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  10. fanquake force-pushed on Jul 15, 2019
  11. in depends/packages/native_libdmg-hfsplus.mk:3 in 31f7825155 outdated
    0@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
    1 package=native_libdmg-hfsplus
    2-$(package)_version=0.1
    3-$(package)_download_path=https://github.com/theuni/libdmg-hfsplus/archive
    4-$(package)_file_name=libdmg-hfsplus-v$($(package)_version).tar.gz
    5-$(package)_sha256_hash=6569a02eb31c2827080d7d59001869ea14484c281efab0ae7f2b86af5c3120b3
    6+$(package)_version=3e5fd3fb56bc9ff03beb535979e33dcf83fe1f70
    7+$(package)_download_path=https://github.com/fanquake/libdmg-hfsplus/archive
    


    dongcarl commented at 8:02 pm on July 15, 2019:
    Any reason why we’re using your fork instead of upstream?

    fanquake commented at 1:27 am on July 16, 2019:

    I’m still applying one commit on top of upstream: https://github.com/fanquake/libdmg-hfsplus/commit/3e5fd3fb56bc9ff03beb535979e33dcf83fe1f70

    Although now that there’s only one commit left we could put the patch in depends and point back to upstream if you’d prefer?


    theuni commented at 5:55 pm on August 2, 2019:

    Although now that there’s only one commit left we could put the patch in depends and point back to upstream if you’d prefer?

    +1

  12. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Jul 15, 2019
  13. theuni commented at 9:23 pm on July 22, 2019: member

    Nice! Concept ack.

    +1 for a new prog to replace our dmg hacks. I think that might also mean that we could get rid of CMake.

    Will review in depth.

  14. MarcoFalke deleted a comment on Jul 22, 2019
  15. practicalswift commented at 11:29 pm on July 22, 2019: contributor
    Concept ACK
  16. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jul 25, 2019
  17. DrahtBot commented at 3:33 am on July 25, 2019: member
  18. Sjors commented at 9:02 am on July 25, 2019: member

    Tested building depends on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave. I still had to do this annoying workaround:

    0open /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/Packages/macOS_SDK_headers_for_macOS_10.14.pkg
    

    And building protobuf fails: log

    If I remove protobuf and native_protobuf it does build. I can then compile QT:

    0./autogen.sh
    1./configure --prefix=`pwd`/depends/x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0 --disable-bip70
    2make
    

    This works, but I get a flood of warnings at the end: log

    Will test on macOS 10.15 Catalina later.

    We should backport this to 0.18 given #16387 and ideally do a 0.18.2 tag before Catalina is out (September or October). Our 0.19 release is scheduled for November #15940, so otherwise there’s no tag to build from.

    Concept ACK on bumping macOS from 10.10 to 10.12, though a small percentage of users would have to stay on the 0.18 branch (the last tag before backport).

    The bottleneck for upgrading macOS is hardware, and that’s pretty durable. Here are the minimum specs for 10.10:

    Minimum specs for 10.12:

    Some refurbished machines for sale:

    Some second hand machines at an even lower price point still work:

    Some don’t:

  19. fanquake commented at 0:56 am on July 26, 2019: member

    I still had to do this annoying workaround:

    Yep, that isn’t new with this change, but may go away if we can remove any reliance on having the headers in the now deprecated location. See details in the Command Line Tools section of the Xcode 10 release notes.

    If I remove protobuf and native_protobuf it does build. I can then compile QT:

    Did you try to build depends before installing the new headers? If you make clean in depends, then try rebuilding as usual it should work. Nothing Protobuf related is being changed in this PR.

  20. fanquake force-pushed on Jul 26, 2019
  21. fanquake removed the label Needs rebase on Jul 26, 2019
  22. jonasschnelli commented at 8:44 am on July 26, 2019: contributor

    Concept ACK. Unsure about the timing, if its already the time to drop 10.10 & 10.11 since 10.11 was released on Oct 2015. According to statista, in April 2019, 10.10 and 10.11 makes about 16% of mac installations. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/944559/worldwide-macos-version-market-share/)

    Aidium publishes their update stats and it looks like, >10% was using 10.11 this week. https://www.adium.im/sparkle/

    It’d say we wait with this.

  23. Sjors commented at 12:32 pm on July 26, 2019: member

    Did you try to build depends before installing the new headers? If you make clean in depends

    I thought I did, but maybe not. I just tried make clean and now protobuf indeed just buids (on 536034b).

    It’d say we wait with this.

    If it doesn’t break anything else, maybe we can do this bump when we bump QT to 5.12 (LTS)?

  24. fanquake force-pushed on Jul 30, 2019
  25. fanquake commented at 2:05 am on July 30, 2019: member

    Updated to add some documentation (Linux) for the macOS 10.14 SDK extraction. This doesn’t have to be the final docs, but should be useful for someone on a Linux machine wanting to extract the SDK and test this PR.

    It’d say we wait with this.

    We don’t have to bump the minimum to 10.12 right now. We could do 10.11, or potentially leave it at 10.10 assuming there aren’t any issues using the new SDK. Regardless, I’d like the rest of the changes (or at least the new Clang) to make it into v0.19.0, so that building for macOS isn’t broken on Debian Buster #16052.

  26. Sjors commented at 5:19 pm on August 1, 2019: member

    From Apple: “All Macintosh computers that can run Mountain Lion, Mavericks, or Yosemite can run El Capitan” (10.11). I suspect many people just don’t realize they can upgrade.

    I managed to build depends on macOS 10.14.6 (Mojave) with the minimum version set to 10.10

    […] may go away if we can remove any reliance on having the headers in the now deprecated location

    That means this PR is not enough to support Catalina, at least not without some other workaround.

  27. in depends/hosts/darwin.mk:4 in 7decfd42ef outdated
    0@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
    1 OSX_MIN_VERSION=10.12
    2 OSX_SDK_VERSION=10.14
    3 OSX_SDK=$(SDK_PATH)/MacOSX$(OSX_SDK_VERSION).sdk
    4-LD64_VERSION=253.9
    5+LD64_VERSION=409.12
    


    theuni commented at 6:02 pm on August 2, 2019:

    All of the LD64_VERSION stuff (used by darwin_CC and darwin_CXX) stuff may be unnecessary now. I believe “-mlinker-version” was a hack around a bug that may have now been fixed.

    Could you try removing the -mlinker-version=... and seeing if the build still succeeds?


    fanquake commented at 3:49 am on August 5, 2019:
    Have combined your LD64 suggestions into the cctools commit.
  28. in depends/packages/native_cctools.mk:37 in 7decfd42ef outdated
    36   echo "$($(package)_clang_sha256_hash)  $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_clang_file_name)" >> $($(package)_extract_dir)/.$($(package)_file_name).hash && \
    37+  echo "$($(package)_libtapi_sha256_hash)  $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_libtapi_file_name)" >> $($(package)_extract_dir)/.$($(package)_file_name).hash && \
    38   $(build_SHA256SUM) -c $($(package)_extract_dir)/.$($(package)_file_name).hash && \
    39+  mkdir -p libtapi installed_libtapi && \
    40+  tar --no-same-owner --strip-components=1 -C libtapi -xf $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_libtapi_file_name) && \
    41+  INSTALLPREFIX=$($(package)_extract_dir)/installed_libtapi ./libtapi/build.sh && \
    


    theuni commented at 6:06 pm on August 2, 2019:

    The main reason for adding this dependency here rather than separately would be so that we can use our fresh compiler (clang) to build it. The same way we handle cctools.

    Unless I’m misunderstanding, the way this is done currently, the system compiler is used. We’ve headed off a few frustrating incompatibilities by using a fixed compiler for the related toolchain components (cctools) in the past, and I think we should continue that.

    Can you move the configure/build around to make that happen? Maybe handle both in _preprocess?


    fanquake commented at 3:49 am on August 5, 2019:
    I’ve switched this around so that libtapi is now being built with our 6.0.1 Clang.
  29. in depends/packages/native_cctools.mk:38 in 7decfd42ef outdated
    40+  tar --no-same-owner --strip-components=1 -C libtapi -xf $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_libtapi_file_name) && \
    41+  INSTALLPREFIX=$($(package)_extract_dir)/installed_libtapi ./libtapi/build.sh && \
    42+  INSTALLPREFIX=$($(package)_extract_dir)/installed_libtapi ./libtapi/install.sh && \
    43   mkdir -p toolchain/bin toolchain/lib/clang/6.0.1/include && \
    44   tar --no-same-owner --strip-components=1 -C toolchain -xf $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_clang_file_name) && \
    45   rm -f toolchain/lib/libc++abi.so* && \
    


    theuni commented at 6:26 pm on August 2, 2019:

    Sadly I can’t remember why the libc++abi.so removal is needed, maybe the SDK ships with the proper one?

    As for dsymutil, that hack was added because the previous cctools didn’t ship with one, and some build scripts expect to find it. If the new cctools ships with one, or if whatever required it has been fixed, this can be removed.


    fanquake commented at 3:48 am on August 5, 2019:
    Combined your suggestions into the Clang update commit.
  30. in depends/packages/native_cctools.mk:56 in 7decfd42ef outdated
    53 $(package)_cxx=$($(package)_extract_dir)/toolchain/bin/clang++
    54 endef
    55 
    56 define $(package)_preprocess_cmds
    57-  cd $($(package)_build_subdir); ./autogen.sh && \
    58+  cd $($(package)_build_subdir); autoreconf -if && ./autogen.sh && \
    


    theuni commented at 6:26 pm on August 2, 2019:
    Isn’t this redundant?

    fanquake commented at 3:48 am on August 5, 2019:
    Have dropped this entire line.
  31. in depends/packages/native_cctools.mk:67 in 7decfd42ef outdated
    66@@ -52,6 +67,9 @@ endef
    67 
    68 define $(package)_stage_cmds
    69   $(MAKE) DESTDIR=$($(package)_staging_dir) install && \
    70+  mkdir -p $($(package)_staging_prefix_dir)/lib/ && \
    71+  cd $($(package)_extract_dir)/installed_libtapi && \
    72+  cp lib/libtapi.so.6 $($(package)_staging_prefix_dir)/lib/ && \
    


    theuni commented at 6:28 pm on August 2, 2019:
    We want this built statically if possible, otherwise this introduces a (rather unnecessary) LDPATH runtime requirement. Does build.sh have static lib support?
  32. theuni commented at 6:32 pm on August 2, 2019: member

    For the most part this looks great. I’ve added a few notes around libtapi which still needs a little work IMO.

    I’ve not tried building yet, I’ll work on getting an SDK extracted.

  33. theuni commented at 8:47 pm on August 2, 2019: member
    I tested a few of my cleanup suggestions above, and they seem to work fine. Feel free to pull the top two from here: https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/commits/16392, or adapt them into your commits however’s easiest.
  34. fanquake force-pushed on Aug 5, 2019
  35. fanquake commented at 3:50 am on August 5, 2019: member

    @theuni I’ve incorporated some of your suggestions (trimming the LD64 stuff, and the clang hacks) and added you as co-author to the relevant commits.

    We are now pointing back to upstream libdmg-hfsplus, with a single patch included in depends.

    We are also now pointing back to the upstream cctools-port repo.

    libtapi is now being built with our 6.0.1 Clang and I’ve removed one of the intermediate directories I was creating.

    I still need to address:

    We want this built statically if possible, otherwise this introduces a (rather unnecessary) LDPATH runtime requirement. Does build.sh have static lib support?

  36. Sjors commented at 9:58 am on August 5, 2019: member
    Building depends on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave still works as of 97b3349.
  37. fanquake force-pushed on Aug 6, 2019
  38. fanquake commented at 6:02 am on August 6, 2019: member
    I’ve updated this to pull the macOS DMG notes (with some minor changes) out of build-osx.md and put them in the contrib/macdeploy/README.md with the other deployment notes. I’ve also added a new section on extracting the new SDK when your using macOS.
  39. BlockMechanic commented at 5:50 am on August 12, 2019: contributor
    :+1: Concept ACK, this may help alleviate issues i’ve had trying to create build bitcoin-qt on aarch64.
  40. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Aug 19, 2019
  41. fanquake force-pushed on Aug 20, 2019
  42. fanquake removed the label Needs rebase on Aug 20, 2019
  43. laanwj added this to the "Chasing Concept ACK" column in a project

  44. laanwj commented at 11:47 am on September 5, 2019: member
    I think it’s too late to do this for 0.19, might want to bump the milestone to 0.20 and then do it early in the merge window?
  45. jonasschnelli commented at 1:27 pm on September 5, 2019: contributor

    I also think it is too early for no good reason.

    According to statista, in April 2019, 10.10 and 10.11 makes about 16% of mac installations.

  46. fanquake commented at 0:51 am on September 10, 2019: member

    I think it’s too late to do this for 0.19,

    Ok. I’ve punted this to v0.20.0, for an early merge. Will address remaining comments here shortly.

  47. fanquake removed this from the milestone 0.19.0 on Sep 10, 2019
  48. fanquake added this to the milestone 0.20.0 on Sep 10, 2019
  49. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Sep 17, 2019
  50. fanquake force-pushed on Sep 23, 2019
  51. fanquake removed the label Needs rebase on Sep 23, 2019
  52. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Oct 2, 2019
  53. laanwj commented at 5:23 pm on October 2, 2019: member

    Ok. I’ve punted this to v0.20.0, for an early merge. Will address remaining comments here shortly.

    :smiling_imp:

  54. dongcarl commented at 7:12 pm on October 8, 2019: member
    Gitian build for 329af88c548ff4afe6fed7fdbad3d39f62044048 is failing for me, tail -n1024 build.log: https://paste.sr.ht/%7Edongcarl/fcafb82a86a68e86c5b29b5e32e00d68211d2661
  55. fanquake commented at 7:13 pm on October 8, 2019: member
    @dongcarl Looks like the macOS SDK isn’t available?
  56. dongcarl commented at 7:15 pm on October 8, 2019: member

    @fanquake docker exec -it --user root gitian-target find -name '*.sdk.tar.gz' outputs ./build/MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz

    Obtained using cd /Applications && tar -C Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/ -czf MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz MacOSX.sdk after downloading Xcode from App Store

  57. fanquake commented at 7:19 pm on October 8, 2019: member

    @dongcarl Has it been untarred inside depends/SDKs?

    Every time I’ve seen fatal error: 'unistd.h' file not found has been because depends can’t find the macOS SDK.

  58. dongcarl commented at 7:20 pm on October 8, 2019: member

    @fanquake Here’s what I see inside the docker container:

    0root@694ebefb6b63:/home/ubuntu/build/bitcoin/depends/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk# ls
    1Entitlements.plist  Library  SDKSettings.json  SDKSettings.plist  System  usr
    
  59. dongcarl commented at 7:22 pm on October 8, 2019: member
    Oh wait… I have too new of an Xcode… It’s actually MacOSX10.15.sdk that I tarred up…
  60. fanquake commented at 7:24 pm on October 8, 2019: member

    Oh wait… I have too new of an Xcode… It’s actually MacOSX10.15.sdk that I tarred up… @dongcarl That would likely actually work fine.

    The real problem is that you need to rename the directory to MacOSX10.14.sdk rather than MacOSX.sdk. See how the path is built in depends.

  61. dongcarl commented at 8:30 pm on October 8, 2019: member

    @fanquake Thanks for offline help for the above. I also ran into another error mentioning libc++abi.so that was solved by readding a previously-removed line:

     0diff --git a/depends/packages/native_cctools.mk b/depends/packages/native_cctools.mk
     1index 2371a691b..ecfc6f9d5 100644
     2--- a/depends/packages/native_cctools.mk
     3+++ b/depends/packages/native_cctools.mk
     4@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ define $(package)_extract_cmds
     5   tar --no-same-owner --strip-components=1 -C libtapi -xf $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_libtapi_file_name) && \
     6   mkdir -p toolchain/bin toolchain/lib/clang/6.0.1/include && \
     7   tar --no-same-owner --strip-components=1 -C toolchain -xf $($(package)_source_dir)/$($(package)_clang_file_name) && \
     8+  rm -f toolchain/lib/libc++abi.so* && \
     9   tar --no-same-owner --strip-components=1 -xf $($(package)_source)
    10 endef
    
  62. dongcarl commented at 11:23 pm on October 8, 2019: member

    With these patches, I was able to perform a Gitian build: https://github.com/fanquake/bitcoin/compare/329af88c548ff4afe6fed7fdbad3d39f62044048...dongcarl:2019-10-fixing-fanquake-osx-bump

    If @theuni could shed light on the context of f6448f99ef1cb688edffcd4b5934af938b0e228a, we should document it.

  63. laanwj referenced this in commit d882f63589 on Oct 14, 2019
  64. BlockMechanic commented at 7:29 pm on October 14, 2019: contributor
    I do not see an actual change to Qt 5.12 in the PR… is this in preparation ?
  65. Fuzzbawls commented at 11:39 pm on October 14, 2019: contributor
    Regarding the bumping of minimum supported macOS (OS X) version: I would say that 10.11 minimum is fine, but 10.12 requires newer CPU based SSE4.1 support that prevent otherwise perfectly viable CPUs (older Xeon CPUs mainly) from upgrading to 10.12.
  66. sidhujag referenced this in commit ecad5267fa on Oct 15, 2019
  67. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 15, 2019
  68. fanquake removed the label Needs rebase on Oct 15, 2019
  69. in contrib/macdeploy/README.md:9 in b052792719 outdated
     8+```bash
     9+make deploy
    10+```
    11 
    12-This script should not be run manually, instead, after building as usual:
    13+During the deployment process, the disk image window will pop up briefly 
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 12:33 pm on October 16, 2019:
    0During the deployment process, the disk image window will pop up briefly
    

    :eyes:

  70. dongcarl commented at 2:21 pm on October 16, 2019: member
    @fanquake You might want to cherry-pick in my README fixes for your changes here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17099/commits/1250d228e14672e4c2e0c83a6548929749c64ce0
  71. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 16, 2019
  72. fanquake commented at 3:10 pm on October 16, 2019: member
    @dongcarl pulled your changes in as part of 1052e1a44e93a3a3cf2fe18a17916ea5f2dbe07f.
  73. dongcarl commented at 3:31 pm on October 16, 2019: member
    @fanquake Also, as mentioned above, you probably also need f6448f99ef1cb688edffcd4b5934af938b0e228a to fix Gitian builds. :grimacing:
  74. MarcoFalke deleted a comment on Oct 16, 2019
  75. MarcoFalke deleted a comment on Oct 16, 2019
  76. MarcoFalke deleted a comment on Oct 16, 2019
  77. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 16, 2019
  78. fanquake commented at 3:52 pm on October 16, 2019: member
    @dongcarl I’ve reverted the removal of that line in bf9488b1dd228a011f61ae21a642ee9ce69e03c2 as well updated 9d51eb8cca106ecaf9a05e52e15bfbf93fbde4a8 to point to the latest upstream version of cctools.
  79. dongcarl commented at 3:46 pm on October 17, 2019: member
    @fanquake Would you say that this is no longer WIP? I’d say it’s ready for merge :grimacing:
  80. MarcoFalke commented at 3:49 pm on October 17, 2019: member
    Not so fast. Let’s fix the travis and DrahtBot failure first. ;)
  81. MarcoFalke commented at 3:49 pm on October 17, 2019: member
  82. fanquake commented at 3:51 pm on October 17, 2019: member

    Would you say that this is no longer WIP? I’d say it’s ready for merge 😬

    I’ll do a final rebase/any cleanup and remove the [WIP] tag.

    Not so fast. Let’s fix the travis and DrahtBot failure first. ;)

    This should just require making the newer SDK available to both.

  83. in .travis.yml:140 in 9d51eb8cca outdated
    156@@ -157,6 +157,6 @@ jobs:
    157         FILE_ENV="./ci/test/00_setup_env_amd64_nowallet.sh"
    158 
    159     - stage: test
    160-      name: 'macOS 10.10  [GOAL: deploy] [no functional tests]'
    161+      name: 'macOS 10.12  [GOAL: deploy] [no functional tests]'
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 3:51 pm on October 17, 2019:
    So the minimum macOS version is 10.12, the SDK version is 10.14, and the cross compile target is x86_64-apple-darwin16? This is not confusing at all.

    fanquake commented at 3:56 pm on October 17, 2019:
    x86_64-apple-darwin16 maps to macOS 10.12, more info here. We’re building with the 10.14 SDK, however this can be newer, and is the same as we’ve been doing in previous releases. i.e using the 10.11 SDK while building for 10.7.
  84. fanquake renamed this:
    WIP build: macOS toolchain update
    build: macOS toolchain update
    on Oct 17, 2019
  85. fanquake removed the label Needs Conceptual Review on Oct 17, 2019
  86. fanquake removed this from the "Chasing Concept ACK" column in a project

  87. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 17, 2019
  88. in contrib/gitian-build.py:212 in 35250677b3 outdated
    207@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ def main():
    208     args.macos = 'm' in args.os
    209 
    210     # Disable for MacOS if no SDK found
    211-    if args.macos and not os.path.isfile('gitian-builder/inputs/MacOSX10.11.sdk.tar.gz'):
    212+    if args.macos and not os.path.isfile('gitian-builder/inputs/MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz'):
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 5:25 pm on October 17, 2019:
    Should the gitian-build in master support compiling older releases?

    dongcarl commented at 6:58 pm on October 17, 2019:
    Not sure that’s a burden we wanna take on. It’s probably going to be more sane for those with that use-case to check out the older tag.

    MarcoFalke commented at 12:28 pm on October 18, 2019:
    Seems fine
  89. in doc/release-notes.md:55 in 35250677b3 outdated
    54 as frequently tested on them.
    55 
    56-From Bitcoin Core 0.17.0 onwards, macOS versions earlier than 10.10 are no
    57-longer supported, as Bitcoin Core is now built using Qt 5.9.x which requires
    58-macOS 10.10+. Additionally, Bitcoin Core does not yet change appearance when
    59+From 0.19.0 onwards, macOS <10.12 is no longer supported.
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 1:22 pm on October 18, 2019:
    0From 0.20.0 onwards, macOS <10.12 is no longer supported.
    

    ?

  90. MarcoFalke added the label Needs gitian build on Oct 18, 2019
  91. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Oct 19, 2019
  92. in depends/hosts/darwin.mk:2 in 6552fbd779 outdated
    0@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
    1-OSX_MIN_VERSION=10.10
    2+OSX_MIN_VERSION=10.12
    3 OSX_SDK_VERSION=10.11
    


    Sjors commented at 9:37 am on October 21, 2019:
    OSX_SDK_VERSION should be 10.14?

    fanquake commented at 12:40 pm on October 21, 2019:
    Looks like you’re commenting on an outdated diff. This is 10.14 in 1728e348c7678504502fc28db109cc870e286695.
  93. in doc/build-osx.md:113 in 6552fbd779 outdated
    109@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ tail -f $HOME/Library/Application\ Support/Bitcoin/debug.log
    110 ```
    111 
    112 ## Notes
    113-* Tested on OS X 10.10 Yosemite through macOS 10.14 Mojave on 64-bit Intel
    114+* Tested on OS X 10.12 Sierra through macOS 10.14 Mojave on 64-bit Intel
    


    Sjors commented at 9:38 am on October 21, 2019:
    through macOS 10.15 Catalina
  94. in contrib/macdeploy/README.md:1 in 1728e348c7 outdated
    0@@ -1,15 +1,135 @@
    1-### MacDeploy ###
    2+# Mac Deployment
    


    Sjors commented at 10:18 am on October 21, 2019:
    Nit: macOS; more SEO and search friendly
  95. in contrib/macdeploy/README.md:52 in 1728e348c7 outdated
    55+xip -x Xcode_10.2.1.xip
    56+tar -C Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/ -czf MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz MacOSX.sdk
    57+```
    58+
    59+Our previously used macOS SDK (`MacOSX10.11.sdk`) can be extracted from
    60+[Xcode 7.3.1 dmg](https://developer.apple.com/devcenter/download.action?path=/Developer_Tools/Xcode_7.3.1/Xcode_7.3.1.dmg).
    


    Sjors commented at 10:34 am on October 21, 2019:

    Maybe update this URL and move it to the top of this section: https://download.developer.apple.com/Developer_Tools/Xcode_10.3/Xcode_10.3.xip (from July 2019)

    In general this section refers to several different versions of Xcode. For SDK 10.14 we need Xcode 10. A more future proof instruction might be :This can be found here: https://developer.apple.com/download/more/ by filtering "xcode 10"


    fanquake commented at 12:37 pm on October 21, 2019:
    Why update this URL, it’s meant to be pointing to the previously used SDK? The link to the newer SDK is later in the file.

    Sjors commented at 2:05 pm on October 21, 2019:
    Ah ok, let’s just drop that altogether then (can be done in a followup, along with bumping xcode 10.2.1 to 10.3 and putting the URL above the place where you need it instead of below).
  96. in contrib/macdeploy/README.md:17 in 1728e348c7 outdated
    20-During the process, the disk image window will pop up briefly where the fancy
    21-settings are applied. This is normal, please do not interfere.
    22+## SDK Extraction
    23 
    24-When finished, it will produce `Bitcoin-Qt.dmg`.
    25+After Xcode version 7.x, Apple started shipping the `Xcode.app` in a `.xip` archive.
    


    Sjors commented at 10:37 am on October 21, 2019:
    Nit: we can lose the historical reference and just say “Xcode.app is packaged in a .xip archive.
  97. Sjors commented at 10:49 am on October 21, 2019: member

    Tested 3525067 on macOS 10.15 Catalina. Although QT depends are built and configure log says checking whether to build Bitcoin Core GUI... yes (Qt5), the configure summary drops it: with gui / qt = no. See configure log.

    • extract-osx-sdk.sh needs to be updated as (though I’ve never used it)
    • macOS deploy instructions still refer to 10.11
    • there’s a reference to MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED > 101100 in optionsdialog.cpp which presumably can be dropped?
  98. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 21, 2019
  99. fanquake commented at 12:47 pm on October 21, 2019: member

    Rebased on master and pushed some changes to fix the doc suggestions above.

    Although QT depends are built and configure log says checking whether to build Bitcoin Core GUI… yes (Qt5), the configure summary drops it: with gui / qt = no. See configure log.

    That’s unrelated to this PR. The reason Qt isn’t being picked up is in the log: configure: WARNING: PROTOC not found; bitcoin-qt frontend will not be built.

    there’s a reference to MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED > 101100 in optionsdialog.cpp which presumably can be dropped?

    There are multiple similar changes that can be made post this PR, but I’m not going to do them here.

  100. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 21, 2019
  101. Sjors commented at 4:14 pm on October 21, 2019: member

    ACK dedc8c7 (modulo Travis being able to download the SDK)

    Re: WARNING: PROTOC not found: that means it’s not finding protobuf in the depends. I’m also getting this issue on master, so indeed unrelated.

    Without BIP70 I can build and do make deploy. Some light testing didn’t reveal any issues.

  102. fanquake commented at 6:06 pm on October 23, 2019: member
    Me and Cory have been discussing moving straight to Clang 9, instead of 6. However that has turned up some issues related to Boost and Clangs -dumpversion. Cory is going to PR some changes first, then we can circle back around to here.
  103. fanquake force-pushed on Oct 25, 2019
  104. fanquake commented at 7:49 pm on October 25, 2019: member
    Pushed up a rebase here as reqeusted by theuni. Going to look at using the 10.15 SDK instead of the 10.14 SDK as well.
  105. MarcoFalke deleted a comment on Nov 12, 2019
  106. MarcoFalke commented at 6:46 pm on November 12, 2019: member

    Pushed up a rebase here as reqeusted by theuni. Going to look at using the 10.15 SDK instead of the 10.14 SDK as well.

    The 10.15 SDK gave problems, so sticking to 10.14 seems better for now? https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/674#issuecomment-546520166

  107. MarcoFalke commented at 6:48 pm on November 12, 2019: member
    Anything left to do here except pushing up the new SDK to our depends mirror?
  108. fanquake commented at 7:26 pm on November 12, 2019: member

    Anything left to do here except pushing up the new SDK to our depends mirror?

    I have some cctools-port changes to review and we will likely switch to a newer version of Clang. I will get that done over the next 2 days.

  109. fanquake added the label Waiting for author on Nov 12, 2019
  110. fanquake force-pushed on Nov 22, 2019
  111. fanquake removed the label Waiting for author on Nov 22, 2019
  112. fanquake commented at 2:11 pm on November 22, 2019: member

    Sorry for the delay. I’ve pushed up the discussed changes. This is now based on top of #17550. I’ve also reordered the commits to have the SDK bump (10.14) at the end.

    One thing left TODO is diff the the 10.14 & 10.15 headers. As well as the LLVM headers. Still going to do this even though we can’t use the 10.15 SDK (Qt 5.9 or 5.12 wont build with it).

  113. fanquake referenced this in commit a6f5b6f47d on Nov 22, 2019
  114. fanquake force-pushed on Nov 22, 2019
  115. MarcoFalke added the label Needs gitian build on Nov 22, 2019
  116. MarcoFalke removed the label Needs gitian build on Nov 22, 2019
  117. sidhujag referenced this in commit 016b46aabb on Nov 22, 2019
  118. MarcoFalke added the label Needs gitian build on Nov 22, 2019
  119. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Nov 23, 2019
  120. MarcoFalke added the label Needs gitian build on Dec 10, 2019
  121. DrahtBot commented at 11:38 pm on December 11, 2019: member

    Gitian builds

    File commit ea756bc48cd5eebc0e508fa7679e31f3e2848d60(master) commit 536e288d36fdb1a40f4d2273e2aaaf1bbd1f2ef7(master and this pull)
    bitcoin-0.19.99-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 1662f4bf8b0b3dfe... cb5c472601bc9554...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz b2983be7590e2792... 5ba50117a3860d01...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz 9d9e87021d691d46... b58cf13c38bb53cd...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz 0581a07f9df8a550... 0fffc3549db36d08...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-i686-pc-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 86e300a01dbd7e1c... 8ef92142945ba7a0...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz 8c051782e303e06c... 6e1eded70e4ecd39...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-osx-unsigned.dmg 56d99ada300198c4...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-osx64.tar.gz 3f269ce1a8331c78...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz f97d7e4aec165ba8... 2936504d3c0f6a38...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz f71433d9c7c6bd0b... 5d28c62b42223ad9...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64-debug.zip 055c6639876ec100... cb4bb1b4e3277c50...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64-setup-unsigned.exe f870106efaa940d6... 512c2aa9117d90c7...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64.zip 3b2f5933bc66419f... 6770b22bfc91a5e2...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 6108e51e85b7c770... ebda9dd2ad20a6f3...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 9c8a85c662ef09b6... 461734f3affa3117...
    bitcoin-0.19.99.tar.gz 76f6b1a89ac8b42e... d720f83ca5ac4922...
    bitcoin-core-linux-0.20-res.yml 83207717cc17da3b... ebcd4e6ddeb95e80...
    bitcoin-core-osx-0.20-res.yml 06093d85ce7c8e0d...
    bitcoin-core-win-0.20-res.yml 184c92964572e6e6... 8dd8c4b7ae001ff1...
    linux-build.log 33f168241e23716f... 40fc4041c040c1ef...
    osx-build.log 57e16d4d5596f266... dad56d55090994f6...
    win-build.log 23600f07b084cf93... 253cc07408f73213...
    bitcoin-core-linux-0.20-res.yml.diff d4e0af7826e13916...
    bitcoin-core-win-0.20-res.yml.diff 59d36ac9e7a272a6...
    linux-build.log.diff 37cfec29ca2022c6...
    osx-build.log.diff 91d10f064efbca04...
    win-build.log.diff 76d9a87e3c6543b2...
  122. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Dec 11, 2019
  123. MarcoFalke deleted a comment on Dec 12, 2019
  124. fanquake referenced this in commit 5270430be3 on Dec 18, 2019
  125. fanquake added this to the "Blockers" column in a project

  126. MarcoFalke commented at 9:35 pm on December 19, 2019: member
    Idk why DrahtBot doesn’t compile this. I am pretty sure I updated it to the newest sdk.
  127. MarcoFalke added the label Needs gitian build on Dec 19, 2019
  128. DrahtBot commented at 4:23 pm on December 20, 2019: member

    Gitian builds

    File commit 6677be64f69b3d6f60f5a675ff9746def27a2de8(master) commit 4f09c775e80299f7b911b6a76b2c0bd518936c92(master and this pull)
    bitcoin-0.19.99-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz f92d4b448b73115a... 3e33be6a107ae08b...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz fd6bd132cb039dd8... 7d25fb166788e598...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz cb5587754977433e... ca1132ac667c9e8a...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz e8a2f90d0634c4bc... a7628ed31ffb8520...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-i686-pc-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 096c1e42406a8e71... 6955969eb02776b5...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz e3447695cdf64582... 72673bd65a3a3eef...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-osx-unsigned.dmg b869749e706814fc...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-osx64.tar.gz 775cdf5feee01485...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz c7a8f7364455191f... 094ba25fd6f822ba...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 91302613a363f679... 3b7e2fe714272056...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64-debug.zip e9a65b6fa6cd380d... 0e62a1f080e1bac7...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64-setup-unsigned.exe d7d3c504eb602e68... 4785616b468a1a81...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64.zip 7f5a5b0268a69ba9... 743cebe3a17663ad...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz c36665ce75b7caf1... 20445ca1852fd977...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz ad3e8b465e0d33c9... 8e6f4f4b955ee3b5...
    bitcoin-0.19.99.tar.gz 6c5e4f9857df5695... 3a0e753242185868...
    bitcoin-core-linux-0.20-res.yml ee712a1279b88c1d... 4da585eb7e305965...
    bitcoin-core-osx-0.20-res.yml 77e14d27de62398f...
    bitcoin-core-win-0.20-res.yml 6879406976cb49de... d429f7f35b4ffdbb...
    linux-build.log 4e7d1cd731586faa... 6201baa78d4d305d...
    osx-build.log fa909531180cdc48... 371c671510b3695d...
    win-build.log 1974207ae76c1912... e9d273fe4b2f04c3...
    bitcoin-core-linux-0.20-res.yml.diff a4c9e2184caa0bf7...
    bitcoin-core-win-0.20-res.yml.diff 7e16036aabb632da...
    linux-build.log.diff 61ded35a46c86799...
    osx-build.log.diff 812725512d989996...
    win-build.log.diff c27d6f6327e7e051...
  129. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Dec 20, 2019
  130. fanquake force-pushed on Dec 21, 2019
  131. Empact commented at 9:32 pm on January 17, 2020: member
    FYI the latest 10.11 security update from Apple was published in 09 Jul 2018. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201222
  132. fanquake force-pushed on Jan 20, 2020
  133. Sjors commented at 3:28 pm on January 31, 2020: member

    tACK 248526e4f941edea8851a5a72a2a1da0ffdfabcf on macOS 10.15.3 (also tried make deploy), provided you can make Travis happy too. I’m not a build system connaisseur though, so an ACK from @theuni would be great.

    We should drop the instructions for obtaining the 10.11 SDK, but that can wait for a followup.

  134. laanwj commented at 10:23 am on February 3, 2020: member
  135. depends: clang 6.0.1
    This also removes some now-unnecessary cctools hacks.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
    1de8c067c7
  136. depends: native_cctools 921, ld64 409.12, libtapi 1000.10.8
    This also removes the obsolete mlinker-version option
    
    Co-Authored-By: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
    ca5055a5aa
  137. build: use macOS 10.14 SDK
    Co-Authored-By: Carl Dong <accounts@carldong.me>
    7e2104433c
  138. fanquake force-pushed on Feb 3, 2020
  139. fanquake added the label Needs gitian build on Feb 3, 2020
  140. jonasschnelli commented at 3:19 pm on February 3, 2020: contributor
    Tested ACK via a depends build with macOS SDK 10.14: https://bitcoinbuilds.org/?job=e969d43f-2cd8-4890-b5ae-bcc2d0ea4195
  141. hebasto commented at 8:04 pm on February 3, 2020: member

    FWIW https://bitcoincore.org/depends-sources/sdks/MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz is up

    Downloaded file

    0$ sha256sum MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz 
    12530c1d88f1aca98994cf32cfcf6099d880965ef0200b8b2a87279c191d56766  MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz
    

    seems broken.

    UPDATE: it was a download error. This one

    0$ sha256sum MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz 
    1328aff47e28c17093d59a72712a9b2e62cd8a8b87bbe03f91abb32960b413f0f  MacOSX10.14.sdk.tar.gz
    

    is ok.

  142. hebasto commented at 9:42 pm on February 3, 2020: member

    Tested ca5055a5aa07aba81a87cf12f6f0526a63c423b5

    Cross compilation on Linux Mint 19.3 with depends and MacOSX10.14.sdk was contaminated by system Qt packages (#18042, #18045, #18051):

    0$ make HOST=x86_64-apple-darwin16 -C depends
    1$ ./autogen.sh
    2$ CONFIG_SITE=$PWD/depends/x86_64-apple-darwin16/share/config.site ./configure
    3$ make
    4...
    5  CXX      qt/qt_libbitcoinqt_a-peertablemodel.o
    6qt/notificator.cpp:50:21: error: allocation of incomplete type 'QDBusInterface'
    7    interface = new QDBusInterface("org.freedesktop.Notifications",
    8                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    9...
    

    The patch from #18051 was applied, then compilation passed successfully with loads of linker warnings like this:

    0  AR       qt/libbitcoinqt.a
    1  CXXLD    qt/bitcoin-qt
    2  CXXLD    qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt
    3ld: warning: direct access in function '__ZN5boost10filesystem6detail9canonicalERKNS0_4pathES4_PNS_6system10error_codeE' from file '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/depends/x86_64-apple-darwin16/lib/libboost_filesystem-mt-x64.a(operations.o)' to global weak symbol '__ZZN5boost6system16generic_categoryEvE25generic_category_instance' from file 'libbitcoin_server.a(libbitcoin_server_a-init.o)' means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
    4...
    

    The resulted Bitcoin-Core.dmg was successfully installed on macOS 10.14 then launched .

  143. DrahtBot commented at 7:02 am on February 4, 2020: member

    Gitian builds

    File commit 365c83e6a8399913cec5f0383978c28f8418fa3b(master) commit 27d2f29cdaf55523fec312e3d2e2bdaac03e7e97(master and this pull)
    bitcoin-0.19.99-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 970e730072cb3102... 8609bbf1aa2b58f9...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 935312465c6da174... 8388955a9e05dd7e...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz 0ed6a37c55b14a2e... 20db37c7ce005f42...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz 028f778eb4927763... 892195271fa0ef4f...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-i686-pc-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 1db644cdfe7214fb... 6b89a91ee86e506a...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz 287253ed7574eaea... c9fddc77aca47dc9...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-osx-unsigned.dmg 821863528e68ec86...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-osx64.tar.gz 1786b62a871209a2...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 22d076616e4c906e... 44e10a5b413dedab...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz c28b4fa1737df120... 2d2fa6cae56012cc...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64-debug.zip b9cae2f4ecb811b5... 6cf65d842ba0ecd0...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64-setup-unsigned.exe 33d162f55ec7a280... 8ae915b5ab910106...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-win64.zip 2e9c7f3b6a81a019... 3fbd03c061614891...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz c6d3a034928bf42f... 65ac2d3021cc8432...
    bitcoin-0.19.99-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 3398c21d3cc2db4a... 13c74d3483fbe588...
    bitcoin-0.19.99.tar.gz 53fdfce17dfd576e... 90861a5bf809f2cf...
    bitcoin-core-linux-0.20-res.yml 5e3e3dc9d073bfe0... 38e155a1cb06ac2d...
    bitcoin-core-osx-0.20-res.yml bb414d323b8702a3...
    bitcoin-core-win-0.20-res.yml 713d925b71fce216... 9e38b7994e600f6b...
    linux-build.log 0fa8aec26c2484b6... bf6f649b3431eb01...
    osx-build.log 1e49555bff5faba3... 0a7dadee8b6a8695...
    win-build.log e61928f15b54a519... baa346388eb2b994...
    bitcoin-core-linux-0.20-res.yml.diff 99f87cfaad3ddb04...
    bitcoin-core-win-0.20-res.yml.diff 621c33c6d581cc43...
    linux-build.log.diff 6bbb682595787575...
    osx-build.log.diff ee4f9786dbeacc12...
    win-build.log.diff 2680bcc8a823d25c...
  144. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Feb 4, 2020
  145. fanquake commented at 7:05 am on February 4, 2020: member
    @MarcoFalke Looks like DrahtBot is still missing the new SDK.
  146. Sjors commented at 9:52 am on February 4, 2020: member
    re-ACK 7e2104433cd0905ccf94632511b3ca0ce5b0463b (rebased from 248526e)
  147. dongcarl commented at 7:08 pm on February 4, 2020: member
  148. laanwj commented at 10:43 am on February 5, 2020: member
    Let’s try to get this merged soon—if we still want this for 0.20 it’s not something that should be done last minute.
  149. dongcarl commented at 11:32 am on February 5, 2020: member

    ACK 7e21044


    Immediate followup: #18072

  150. Empact commented at 11:35 am on February 5, 2020: member

    Built depends successfully on 10.14.6

    Is there anything more to say re the “obsolete mlinker-version option”? Is it obsolete only in that it is no longer required for build?

  151. laanwj referenced this in commit c8ce2632eb on Feb 5, 2020
  152. laanwj merged this on Feb 5, 2020
  153. laanwj closed this on Feb 5, 2020

  154. laanwj commented at 1:30 pm on February 5, 2020: member

    @fanquake I apologize for my lateness, but here’s my outstanding changes so that we can generate and use the SDK with headers as requested: fanquake/bitcoin@macos-toolchain-update…dongcarl:2020-01-macos-sdk-with-headers

    Thanks, please add these instructions in a new PR!

  155. dongcarl commented at 4:35 pm on February 5, 2020: member

    @fanquake I apologize for my lateness, but here’s my outstanding changes so that we can generate and use the SDK with headers as requested: fanquake/bitcoin@macos-toolchain-update…dongcarl:2020-01-macos-sdk-with-headers

    Thanks, please add these instructions in a new PR!

    It’s here! :-) #18072

  156. fanquake deleted the branch on Feb 6, 2020
  157. fanquake removed this from the "Blockers" column in a project

  158. laanwj referenced this in commit 1a51cd1ac5 on Feb 28, 2020
  159. sidhujag referenced this in commit 639537df89 on Feb 29, 2020
  160. deadalnix referenced this in commit 32440df7de on Mar 26, 2020
  161. deadalnix referenced this in commit 1b6adb5086 on Mar 27, 2020
  162. ftrader referenced this in commit 4e61af73d7 on May 19, 2020
  163. zkbot referenced this in commit 2a39656e6d on Jul 30, 2020
  164. zkbot referenced this in commit e0692ed4df on Aug 7, 2020
  165. sidhujag referenced this in commit e6a74d1ea3 on Nov 10, 2020
  166. sidhujag referenced this in commit 45b75873ec on Nov 10, 2020
  167. laanwj referenced this in commit f4ac48d30a on Dec 21, 2020
  168. sidhujag referenced this in commit 0a4a17691d on Dec 21, 2020
  169. furszy referenced this in commit 816f42d7ac on May 25, 2021
  170. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 428aff35e2 on Jul 15, 2021
  171. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 2dec821b43 on Jul 15, 2021
  172. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 3da3f41386 on Jul 20, 2021
  173. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 9e7883cf19 on Jul 20, 2021
  174. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 37e36d51e8 on Jul 20, 2021
  175. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit a3156df2f5 on Jul 20, 2021
  176. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 6541754a8a on Aug 1, 2021
  177. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 8d60a361bb on Aug 24, 2021
  178. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 18da0abdd0 on Aug 24, 2021
  179. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit ff51a02983 on Aug 25, 2021
  180. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit f3a0d37065 on Aug 25, 2021
  181. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 86ef0f7bc9 on Aug 26, 2021
  182. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 1e38f00776 on Aug 26, 2021
  183. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit e11d087f8d on Aug 26, 2021
  184. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 708cc7575d on Aug 27, 2021
  185. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 0bb694d91a on Aug 30, 2021
  186. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit abaa0b3c92 on Sep 1, 2021
  187. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit a358d2e593 on Sep 1, 2021
  188. DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-12-19 03:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me