Add bitcoin-{node,gui} to release binaries for IPC

Sjors commented at 4:04 pm on February 5, 2025: member

Have depends make libmultiprocess by default. This PR causes the following behavior changes:

bitcoin-node and bitcoin-gui binaries are included in releases, due to ENABLE_IPC option being switched on by default in depends builds
ENABLE_IPC is also switched on by default in non-depends builds
Various changes to CI: switching on ENABLE_IPC on in most configurations and using bitcoin-node binary for functional tests in two of them.
The bitcoin-node and bitcoin-gui are added to Maintenance.cmake (since they’re now in the release)
macOS and Linux installation instructions are updated to install capnp by default

This PR doesn’t need to do all of 3 things at once. However it’s is simpler, avoids code churn (especially in CI), and probably less confusing to make all these changes in the same PR.

Windows and OpenBSD are not supported yet, the latter due to a fairly trivial upstream issue. Therefore for those platforms ENABLE_IPC is off by default.

The initial main use case for IPC is to enable experimental support for the Mining IPC interface. A working example of a Stratum v2 Template Provider client using this interface can be found here: https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/pull/48.

See #31756 for discussion of when this should happen. Supersedes #30975.

Guix hashes:

 010346278e57d5f3d94711f89398c18ca2e50078f9fc3f01c888db093265946c9  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
 1c6994657194c5331734dc6ed74689708185eb8a38275846ab2ee8960c9208686  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
 2953fbe114a48b55af33fb3e56623831911b7e4cbbeba4efe4f063bc5d1a0b561  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
 33ad25b5049e354a22b4f910eb573626ac910fd8189a883b0d11751e229f266ed  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
 4a4f2871b3fa99c1c4fc7d898722fee57c3080f0680ff13f871dd5ecf0147c77b  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
 550d6e6b5f775dab56c2149022b9f27631722f88ee1a497fb1a56d758862da136  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
 6c976a2a36a6e39d6e1eb06c7be0ee9a72a5b734dc7fdc6d1b3e25fb57c7eaf38  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
 7aceefb7909baa2b3d078482886704240762b4c0acca039b6320b9c574c8d872c  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-arm64-apple-darwin-codesigning.tar.gz
 85c3e88225a578a2c415d7b8c8e8e7018efc1e79b1ff4e9ea1dbe1bdffbb4e707  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
 936b16a0c76f9023bc718c2908355bc6f480d0b3fccb8fe5c599f003710f9fede  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.zip
107bad618a57536a2bacef5328ab04b5fe7f0e260456f7b2dba2bcd4ce9981901b  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6.tar.gz
119b0b7cf5e4a811076a20059bd2faa4500c29da0df5df1c76efa2aa949c89b0ba  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
120cb29a04ede7c51321c21ebe3d9d96881e955ab70993002bfe4eccf262b60d57  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
1309e076ea366f73899fa18eb3c57762f588c6419456c4c8f8c6833383dbe19ec8  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
14982ba89a0bc3571f0784723577c55a2b8aa61498f518402e01db0180ee9b6717  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
1541236998ae866179867b09bb45ed5b9b7c7e5111ffb40f55782ef58adae6d2cc  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
16e210b7b1eec47b62216ed78ff375ca5840c300462cf048bfdd4ac1508c45896a  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
173c2c01d8c99955fb720d10d72f87515eb81a9ffc71ea05224b5bd480dc2b086b  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
188b0939a8b01749003f2a55eabe376ba5c98ee889f0aec8c281259100bd8a17aa  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-x86_64-apple-darwin-codesigning.tar.gz
191f6879946a103e14e33fd1c2ab69e8c38dd9b8d32eaae646bf55f7ac790f42c3  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
2002e50e4c5a1ca71e7609da2790d9a13eb9bc34bf510dc89c5fd454d349c94d64  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.zip
214eed5f8cb1ae410cbf5f02308d61aac3beabbe7271245d705daf378007dbe09c  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
229d74c1272060c304a2a6dd95d171d11b81710090d8429e4dd8d3bef7a52b9824  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
2366b269ead42bc6a0d662710de645886955cf14a2bf65b5d955ec191da3461e61  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
24f1ae38d8add7b7c19e7cdb6ab88c66afeb99bc25f532d315b9e961920c065ad6  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
2578907b8718343a61c82f35f64aa73fb60c9b3fa04b602673be29ffdbab8ada84  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-win64-codesigning.tar.gz
268fb18bfaf6429a7cf7050fd9b5d8be81c0a27fb259b2e0232629024d223ea65a  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-win64-debug.zip
27d33a6565cf833a590207bd003164399152862a124f48ee121a376dcc90175566  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
28f00173d09de94351a6b6a76aa402370bb776266d0fc5969fce76e90fc66e6700  guix-build-8b73630c6fe6/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-8b73630c6fe6-win64-unsigned.zip

DrahtBot commented at 4:04 pm on February 5, 2025: contributor

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/31802.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type	Reviewers
Concept ACK	TheCharlatan
Stale ACK	ryanofsky

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

#32262 (build: Restore cross-compilation for Android by hebasto)
#32162 (depends: Switch from multilib to platform-specific toolchains by hebasto)
#31895 (doc: Improve dependencies.md by NicolaLS)
#31349 (ci: detect outbound internet traffic generated while running tests by vasild)
#30595 (kernel: Introduce initial C header API by TheCharlatan)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

LLM Linter (✨ experimental)

Possible typos and grammar issues:

informati -> information [incomplete word]

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Feb 6, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Feb 7, 2025

sipa commented at 9:03 pm on February 7, 2025: member

Some chatter from IRC:

 017:21:41 < darosior> It might be confusing to release both a bitcoin-wallet utility and a bitcoin-wallet binary as part of multiprocess?
 117:24:08 < darosior> We could rename the utility, but then it would be nice to at least have one deprecation cycle. Given recent momentum i estimate it's possible we might release multiprocess in 
 2                     30.0, which means if we want to deprecate the bitcoin-wallet utility name we should do it.. now?
 317:33:31 < sipa> bitcoin-wallet-util ?
 4...
 523:38:57 < _aj_> darosior: bitcoin-wallet-process, bitcoin-gui-process, etc? it's multi *-process!
 603:04:34 < Sjors[m]> darosior: at the moment there is no wallet binary if were to enable multiprocess. That won't happen until [#19460](/bitcoin-bitcoin/19460/).
 7...
 803:05:18 < Sjors[m]> Or maybe already in [#10102](/bitcoin-bitcoin/10102/)
 9...
1003:05:50 < Sjors[m]> In any case [#31802](/bitcoin-bitcoin/31802/) only adds bitcoin-node and bitcoin-gui.
11...
1203:07:19 < Sjors[m]> Though if we want to rename the utility eventually, it's always better to do it early.

Sjors commented at 10:58 am on February 8, 2025: member

@sipa I opened #31827

onlinesipahimithu commented at 1:26 am on February 9, 2025: none

GOOD lesson from

bitcoin deleted a comment on Feb 9, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Feb 10, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Feb 13, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Feb 13, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Feb 17, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Feb 20, 2025

ryanofsky referenced this in commit 83e40d3b52 on Feb 24, 2025

ryanofsky referenced this in commit 8619f03ec2 on Feb 24, 2025

ryanofsky referenced this in commit cbb7b41c20 on Feb 24, 2025

fanquake referenced this in commit 01f7715766 on Feb 25, 2025

fanquake referenced this in commit ba0a4391ff on Feb 25, 2025

pablomartin4btc referenced this in commit bd2453d134 on Feb 26, 2025

pablomartin4btc referenced this in commit 75d5d235a6 on Feb 26, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Feb 27, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Feb 27, 2025

ngn999 referenced this in commit fd12bfb763 on Feb 27, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Mar 5, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Mar 11, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Mar 11, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Mar 12, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Mar 12, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Mar 12, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Mar 14, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Mar 17, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Mar 17, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Mar 18, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Mar 18, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Mar 18, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Mar 29, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Mar 31, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Mar 31, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Mar 31, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Apr 2, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 2, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Apr 2, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Apr 4, 2025

Sjors commented at 4:32 pm on April 10, 2025: member

As discussed in IRC, I’ll turn on IPC in the default cmake build (not just the dev preset). Either here on in the previous PR.

ryanofsky commented at 5:53 pm on April 10, 2025: contributor

As discussed in IRC, I’ll turn on IPC in the default cmake build (not just the dev preset). Either here on in the previous PR.

In case it helps I actually have an old commit implementing this: a6d9db48249d5d9bd63ea0d99e15066a1299e5c3 (branch) since I was originally thinking of including it in #31741

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 11, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Apr 11, 2025

Sjors marked this as ready for review on Apr 11, 2025

Sjors commented at 7:32 pm on April 11, 2025: member

Marked this as ready for review, but see discussion here: #30975 (comment)

ryanofsky commented at 8:49 pm on April 11, 2025: contributor

Code review 1ed02d5bf4a4bcf58cad0addaaaf9c171e29d8c6

It seems like there are some MULTIPROCESS=1 settings added earlier in this PR that are not removed later and become ignored, so these would be good to clean up
It could be good to simplify this PR and avoid churn by moving the two CI commits last (if they are still needed) after changing the cmake and depends ENABLE_IPC defaults from true to false.
It could make sense to rename the NO_MULTIPROCESS depends option to NO_IPC to be consistent with the cmake ENABLE_IPC option. There are some other depends/cmake options that seem to share the same names like NO_WALLET/ENABLE_WALLET, NO_ZMQ/WITH_ZMQ, NO_USDT/WITH_USDT, etc

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 11, 2025

Sjors commented at 9:58 pm on April 11, 2025: member

I moved the ci commits last and removed the unneeded stuff. So this PR is now independent of #30975, although it overlaps.

Hopefully didn’t break anything…

Does anyone have a strong preference which CI job(s) should build without multiprocess? Right now the Windows and one i686 cirrus job are.

Any which CI job(s) should use bitcoin-node in the functional tests? I picked CentOS (depends) and macOS native (no depends).

Except for Windows, these choices are fairly arbitrary.

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 11, 2025

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Apr 14, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 15, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Apr 15, 2025

in depends/README.md:121 in 9b46b7d582 outdated

117@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ The following can be set when running make: `make FOO=bar`
118 - `NO_WALLET`: Don't download/build/cache libs needed to enable the wallet (SQLite)
119 - `NO_BDB`: Don't download/build/cache BerkeleyDB
120 - `NO_USDT`: Don't download/build/cache packages needed for enabling USDT tracepoints
121-- `MULTIPROCESS`: Build libmultiprocess (experimental)
122+- `NO_IPC`: Don't build experimental libmultiprocess (default on Windows and OpenBSD)

ryanofsky commented at 5:17 pm on April 15, 2025:

In commit “build: depends makes libmultiprocess by default” (9b46b7d582edcf61bbec5b01c8e661af804e22d6)

Think it would be good if this description described the full effects of this option. Would maybe say “NO_IPC: don’t build Cap’n Proto and libmultiprocess packages, and disable building IPC binaries (bitcoin-node, bitcoin-gui)”

Also, since this is the most significant commit in the PR, which controls whether IPC binaries are included in releases, it would be good to mention the effect this has on releases in the commit description.

Commit description could also mention effect this has on CI builds: it cause more depends builds to build IPC binaries, but still the only build running functional tests with them is the i686_multiprocess one.

Sjors commented at 12:42 pm on April 17, 2025:

Expanded the comment and commit description.

ryanofsky approved

ryanofsky commented at 5:35 pm on April 15, 2025: contributor

Code review ACK 5d96e656d72abee468f5f49759b1b08eab445d4d. Changes seem pretty clean and simple now. I think it might be good for PR to clearly mention the 3 changes in behavior it causes:

1 - Causes bitcoin-node and bitcoin-gui binaries to be included in releases and ENABLE_IPC option to be switched on by default in depends builds. 2 - Also causes ENABLE_IPC option to be switched on by default in both non-depends builds 3 - Makes various changes to CI: switching on ENABLE_IPC on in most configurations and using bitcoin-node binary for functional tests in two of them.

It would also be good to point out that that this PR doesn’t need to do all of 3 things at once. It is simpler and probably less confusing to make all these changes in the same PR, but if we want to isolate any of these things and make them separate, that’s possible.

re: #31802 (comment)

All the choices you made about CI jobs options seem reasonable, and seem to test everything we would want. But @maflcko has best understanding of CI jobs and might have input.

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Apr 17, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 17, 2025

Sjors commented at 12:42 pm on April 17, 2025: member

Rebased after #32271, updated PR description, commit description and comment as suggested here: #31802 (review)

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 17, 2025

DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Apr 17, 2025

in doc/multiprocess.md:19 in 341b2a99e6 outdated

15@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ Specifying `-DENABLE_IPC=ON` requires [Cap'n Proto](https://capnproto.org/) to b
16 
17 ### Depends installation
18 
19-Alternately the [depends system](../depends) can be used to avoid need to install local dependencies. A simple way to get started is to pass the `MULTIPROCESS=1` [dependency option](../depends#dependency-options) to make:
20+Alternatively the [depends system](../depends) can be used to avoid needing to local install dependencies:

DrahtBot commented at 2:02 pm on April 17, 2025:

(✨ LLM generated, experimental)

Alternatively the depends system can be used to avoid needing to local install dependencies: —> …avoid needing to install local dependencies:

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Apr 17, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Apr 17, 2025

Sjors commented at 7:32 am on April 18, 2025: member

This or a followup needs to update doc/dependencies.md and update the build instructions to change opt-in wording to opt-out. I’ll update that here if #32293 (comment) lands earlier.

ryanofsky approved

ryanofsky commented at 6:12 pm on April 21, 2025: contributor

Code review ACK 341b2a99e646246a9e4d3aa283b2b59442cfad27. Only change since last review is making various improvements to comments and rebasing.

Would be nice to update doc/dependencies.md here since #32293 is no longer doing that but not important.

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 23, 2025

Sjors commented at 8:19 am on April 23, 2025: member

Rebased after #32293, updated the documentation it introduced, and added Cap’n Proto to doc/dependencies.md. Also took the LLM fix.

in doc/dependencies.md:39 in ce415e06b1 outdated

35@@ -36,3 +36,4 @@ Bitcoin Core requires one of the following compilers.
36 | [SQLite](../depends/packages/sqlite.mk) (wallet) | [link](https://sqlite.org) | [3.38.5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25378) | [3.7.17](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19077) | No |
37 | Python (scripts, tests) | [link](https://www.python.org) | N/A | [3.10](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30527) | No |
38 | [systemtap](../depends/packages/systemtap.mk) ([tracing](tracing.md)) | [link](https://sourceware.org/systemtap/) | [4.8](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26945)| N/A | No |
39+| [Cap'n Proto](../depends/packages/capnp.mk) | [link](https://capnproto.org) | [0.6.1](https://capnproto.org/install.html) | 0.5.3 | Yes |

fanquake commented at 8:56 am on April 23, 2025:

0| [Cap'n Proto](../depends/packages/capnp.mk) | [link](https://capnproto.org) | [0.6.1](https://capnproto.org/install.html) | 0.5.3 | No |

Sjors commented at 9:54 am on April 23, 2025:

Fixed. @TheCharlatan why was this set to Yes in the original?

TheCharlatan commented at 8:23 pm on April 29, 2025:

Fixed. @TheCharlatan why was this set to Yes in the original?

It did not make that much sense to include since it was not part of the release binaries yet, but I thought it could be considered a runtime dependency in case it is not linked statically through depends or some other method.

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 23, 2025

in doc/build-osx.md:132 in 1eedff84d7 outdated

133-Skip if you do not need IPC functionality.
134-
135-```bash
136-brew install capnp
137-```
138+The depedency on `capnp` can be avoided by compiling without IPC-enabled binaries

maflcko commented at 9:58 am on April 23, 2025:

depedency → dependency

Sjors commented at 9:59 am on April 23, 2025: member

An alternative approach could be to make Cap’n Proto optional and have -DENABLE_IPC default to ON only if its present. Though I vaguely recall that with CMake we wanted to move away from enabling config options depending on whether a library is found.

Sjors force-pushed on Apr 23, 2025

TheCharlatan commented at 8:25 pm on April 29, 2025: contributor

Concept ACK

An alternative approach could be to make Cap’n Proto optional and have -DENABLE_IPC default to ON only if its present. Though I vaguely recall that with CMake we wanted to move away from enabling config options depending on whether a library is found.

Yeah, this is intentionally not done anymore since the cmake migration. I think the current approach is fine.

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 6, 2025

Sjors force-pushed on May 7, 2025

Sjors commented at 9:04 am on May 7, 2025: member

Rebased after #32086.

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 7, 2025

DrahtBot added the label CI failed on May 7, 2025

DrahtBot commented at 10:38 am on May 7, 2025: contributor

🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. Task tidy: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/runs/41784006413 LLM reason (✨ experimental): The CI failed due to clang-tidy errors related to incorrect use of std::move and thread_local.

Try to run the tests locally, according to the documentation. However, a CI failure may still happen due to a number of reasons, for example:

Possibly due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest commit of the target branch.
A sanitizer issue, which can only be found by compiling with the sanitizer and running the affected test.
An intermittent issue.

Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

Sjors commented at 11:34 am on May 7, 2025: member

@ryanofsky CI complains about std::move in libmultiprocess: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6187773452877824, e.g.:

0/ci_container_base/src/ipc/libmultiprocess/include/mp/proxy-io.h:252:16: error: forwarding reference passed to std::move(), which may unexpectedly cause lvalues to be moved; use std::forward() instead [bugprone-move-forwarding-reference,-warnings-as-errors]
1[05:29:23.932]   252 |         m_fn = std::move(fn);
2[05:29:23.932]       |                ^~~~~~~~~
3[05:29:23.932]       |                std::forward<Fn>

DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on May 7, 2025

build: add bitcoin-{node,gui} to Maintenance.cmake 050add0728

build: depends makes libmultiprocess by default

This causes IPC binaries (bitcoin-node, bitcoin-gui) to be included
in releases.

The effect on CI is that this causes more depends builds to build IPC
binaries, but still the only build running functional tests with them
is the i686_multiprocess one.

Except for Windows and OpenBSD.

67736ade55

ci: build one depends job without multiprocess f2fa17c29b

ci: use bitcoin-node for one depends job

The bitcoin-node binary is built on all platforms which have
multiprocess enabled, but for functional tests it's only used in
CentOS native (depends) job. The next commit will also add a
non-depends job.

263ac301b5

cmake: enable ENABLE_IPC option by default

Install capnp on non-depends CI jobs.

Use the bitcoin-node binary in the macOS native non-depends job.

Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>

bab9232035

doc: update deps install notes for multiprocess 5032caca16

Sjors commented at 2:52 pm on May 7, 2025: member

Rebased after #28710.

Sjors force-pushed on May 7, 2025

DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on May 7, 2025

Add bitcoin-{node,gui} to release binaries for IPC #31802

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

Reviews

Conflicts

LLM Linter (✨ experimental)